Question #1560

Diagramming

Started by Nishant-Varma · started 2020-05-14 14:56 · last activity 2020-06-27 22:04 · 2 replies

For the last sentence in the question, shouldn't it be diagrammed as a compound statement? Since it is talking about icy surfaces and not being heavily pocketed? How can we just ignore the solid icy surfaces?

Replies

  1. christinea303 · 2020-06-20 19:51

    Please reply to this question

  2. BenMingov · 2020-06-27 22:04

    Hi Nishant and Christinea303, thanks for reaching out. I think you guys are totally right that we cannot ignore the compound condition brought up in the last sentence of the passage. Planetary bodies -some- solid icy surface AND not surface heavily pockmarked It shouldn't be ignored for sure. However, I don't think it was in the explanation provided in this question. Please let me know if we are on the same page concerning this question as I would happy to respond with an explanation. However, I believe the last statement you were referring to was diagrammed in the stimulus summary as you described. Best of luck with your studies!

Sign in to reply.