Answer

Started by Ceci · started 2018-10-09 00:00 · last activity 2019-02-05 21:32 · 2 replies

What;'s the answer?

Replies

  1. Shiyi-Zhang · 2019-02-03 03:23

    Why is E correct?
  2. Ravi · 2019-02-05 21:32

    @Ceci and @Shiyi-Zhang, Happy to help. The agricultural economist opens her argument by saying that over the last several years, increases in worldwide grain production have virtually ceased. These are facts. She then says that further increases in production will be really tough because most usable farmland is already being farmed almost as efficiently as it can be. However, she says that worldwide demand for grain has been increasing steadily, largely due to the continuing population growth. As a result of this, she posits that a severe worldwide grain shortage is likely. In order to answer this question well, it's imperative that we have a great grasp of the argument structure that's present. There are two ideas being supported in the stimulus: further increases will be extremely difficult and a severe worldwide grain shortage is likely. Which one of these is the overall conclusion? We can put the two phrases next to each other with a 'because' in between them to see which one makes more sense as the overall conclusion. further increases (in production) will be extremely difficult BECAUSE a severe worldwide grain shortage is likely Does that make sense? Not at all. Let's try the other way around. a severe worldwide grain shortage is likely BECAUSE further increases (in production) will be extremely difficult Does this one make sense? Yes, it does! This means that 'a severe worldwide grain shortage is likely' is our main conclusion, and 'further increases will be extremely difficult' is a subsidiary/intermediate conclusion that supports the overall conclusion of the argument. The question stem asks us to identify the role played by the claim that further increases in worldwide grain production will be extremely difficult. This is what we identified as the subsidiary/intermediate conclusion, so we need to go to the answers with that in mind. (E) says, "It is an intermediate conclusion that is presented as evidence for the argument's main conclusion." This is exactly what we had anticipated the correct answer saying, so (E) is our choice. Does this make sense? Let us know if you have any more questions!

Sign in to reply.