PrepTest 118

[lcid:3569] Prep Test 118 LSAT — Reading Comp — S2 Reading comp

Passage

Questions 15-19  .        A lichen consists of a fungus living in symbiosis  . (i.e., a mutually beneficial relationship) with Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary

Topic: Science


Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph note
    • Background on lichen; Question; New study/Answer
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Lichen = fungi + alga
    • Most fungi branches known
    • Question - What are the evolutionary origins of lichen-forming fungi?
    • New study/Answer - Related to previously known fungi (explains similar appearance)

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph note
    • Difficulties in studying (Problem/Solution); New study
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Fungi are parasites/symbiotes = hard to separate from associated organism
    • Lichen-forming fungi - Particularly hard to separate → Unknown evolutionary background
    • New study addressed problem → These fungi related to others
    • Prediction - Yet more lichen-forming fungi will be placed on existing fungi family tree branches

Paragraph 3

  • Paragraph note
    • Implication - Old Theory(Assumption)/New Theory
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Old theory - Parasites evolve to be more benign over time
    • New theory - Fungi can go in both directions (get benign, then become parasites)

Main Point: While the evolutionary origins of lichen-forming DNA used to be a mystery, a new DNA study has shown that they are close relatives of previously known branches of the fungus family tree, which has implications for certain evolutionary assumptions about parasitic interactions.

Key Lines?

Lines 4-6 - A scientific mystery (question) is introduced

Lines 6-11 - A new study resolves the mystery (answers the question)

Lines 16-24 - Why the mystery existed (a problem)

Lines 32-35 - How that problem was solved

Lines 45-50 - An implication of the study (overturns assumption)

Meta-Structure?

New Discovery//Question/Answer - The passage introduces a scientific mystery in Lines 4-6 - the evolutionary origins of lichen-forming fungi. A mystery implies a question - what are the evolutionary origins of this fungi? When such a question is posed, the rest of the passage generally dives into answers, with the Author’s preferred or supported answer serving as the main point, and that answer serving as a new discovery (which are frequently discussed in Science passages). Here, the Author jumps right into discussing a new DNA study that has answered the question (Lines 6-11) - these fungi are related to other common fungi that have already been placed on the evolutionary tree. While such an early answer might suggest the passage has a broader main point, here, Paragraph 2 walks through why the mystery existed and how it was resolved, with more specifics on the discovery/answer. And Paragraph 3 talks about an implication of the new discovery. So that answer is the main point of the passage, and the implication will likely be mentioned in the correct answer to the Main Point question, though it doesn’t have to be.

Problem/Solution - Paragraph 2 describes the problem with studying lichen-forming DNA that led to the mystery. This paragraph established that examining fungal DNA is hard because they’re usually parasites/symbiotes, and it’s hard to separate their DNA from the DNA of the associated organism (Lines 16-19). And this is particularly difficult for lichen-forming fungi, for a variety of reasons (Lines 19-28). The passage does show that this problem has been solved by “using new analytical tools” that let researchers isolate fungal DNA, though it’s light on details. Since this is a limited part of the passage, expect at most a question on it.

Old Theory/New Theory (Assumption) - Paragraph 3 discusses an implication of the new research, and that implication overturns a “long-standing evolutionary assumption” (in other words, an old theory - Lines 45-50). That assumption stated parasites evolve to be more benign, but, for fungi, that assumption doesn’t hold. This implication replaces an old theory/assumption with a new theory. Since implications, assumptions, and Old Theory/New Theory structures all tend to show up in questions, there’s a good chance that we’re going to get at least one question on this information.

List - There are a couple short lists in the passage. Lines 11-12 present a list of common fungi of which lichen-forming fungi are close relatives. Lines 20-28 present a list of characteristics of lichen-forming fungi that have made them hard to study, leading to the central mystery in the passage. Both of these are very limited, so expect at most one question on either.

Last Thoughts?

There were some numbers in Paragraph 2, but we can always go back to them, so you shouldn’t have spent much time trying to digest them. There’s also some science in the reasons that lichen-forming fungi are hard to study in Paragraph 2, so noting where that shows up is more important than fully understanding what all of it means. This is one of those passages where it’s likely that we’re going to have to head back to the passage for some detail-based questions, and for those, it’s important that we don’t get bogged down in those details while reading so we have time to look for relevant ones while doing the questions!

Question prompt

Which one of the Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: C

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Science

Strategy Overview

Review our notes on the purpose of each paragraph, then find an answer that most closely aligns with that overall understanding

Answer Anticipation

For these passage organization-style Argument Structure questions, we should already have done most of the work. We spend a few seconds after reading each paragraph to describe the role/purpose of it within the passage as a whole, and so we should review those notes and then find an answer that matches up with them:Paragraph 1 - Background on lichen; Question; New study/AnswerParagraph 2 - Difficulties in studying; New studyParagraph 3 - Implication - Old Theory(Assumption)/New Theory

Answer choices

  1. A
    explanation of the difficulty Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited

    (A) The explanation of the difficulty in classifying lichens is in Paragraph 2, so this answer is wrong in starting out with that.

  2. B
    definition of lichens; discussion Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited

    (B) The passage does start with a definition of lichens, and it then discusses new discoveries (well, new discovery) that have implications for lichens’ evolutionary history. However, this answer fails to capture the difficulties that led to the mystery. Additionally, the passage says that this research overturned a long-standing evolutionary assumption - that’s not the same as supporting a new evolution theory.

  3. C
    definition of lichens; discussion Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C matches the stem

    (C) The passage starts with a definition of lichens. This answer is a little rough around the edges in going straight to a discussion of the difficulties in classifying the fungal components of lichen, seemingly ignoring the second half of Paragraph 1. However, it implicitly references that section because the “difficulty” is directly related to the mystery that’s raised in that section of the passage. Paragraph 2 also more clearly describes the results of the research, so this answer doesn’t miss capturing where that shows up, and it does dive into the resolution of this difficulty. And Paragraph 3 does discuss the implications of the research. We probably wouldn’t pick this answer until we eliminated everything else, but it’s ultimately the one that best reflects the structure of the passage.

  4. D
    discussion of the symbiotic Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited

    (D) The first part of this answer matches up with the first part of the passage, where a definition of this symbiotic relationship is given. However, the new research was designed to place lichen-forming fungi on the fungal evolutionary family tree, not to distinguish between parasitic and symbiotic fungi. This might have been an implication of that research, but it isn’t the findings of the research itself.

  5. E
    explanation of the symbiotic Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited

    (E) While the first two clauses here aren’t the best, we wouldn’t eliminate this answer based on them. The definition at the beginning could serve as an explanation of the symbiotic nature of lichens, and there is a discussion of the problems associated with studying lichens after. However, the passage goes into implications of the research that solved for these problems - it doesn’t talk about the implications of the problems themselves, as this answer choice states. This answer is therefore incorrect.

What this tests

Discussion