PrepTest 125

[lcid:3598] Prep Test 125 LSAT — Reading Comp — S3 Reading comp

Passage

Questions 8-15  .        The painter Roy Lichtenstein helped to define pop  . art—the movement that incorporated commonplace  . objects Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary

Topic: Humanities


Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph note
    • Lichtenstein’s style and accomplishments
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Definition of “pop art”:
      • Common objects and commercial art in paintings
    • Author’s view on Lichtenstein’s accomplishment:
      • Poked fun at the pretentious art world and expressed a seriousness of theme (more than parody)
    • Author’s attitude: “complex result” (line 6); “managed to convey” (line 8); “transcend mere parody” (lines 9-10)

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph note
    • Pop art as a reaction to late abstract expressionism
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Conventional view:
      • Pop art emerged in response to abstract expressionism
    • Author’s view:
      • Pop artists like Lichtenstein reacted to the second generation of abstract expressionism (which lost most of power)
    • Author’s attitude: “at first difficult to see” (line 12); “had already lost much of its force” (line 21); “powerful early abstract expressionist work” (lines 22-23); “seemed airy, high-minded, and overly lyrical” (line 25); “fading emotional power of abstract expressionism, rather than an aloof attempt to ignore it” (lines 28-30)

Paragraph 3

  • Paragraph note
    • Other dimension of Lichtenstein; contrast with other pop art
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Author’s view
      • If Lichtenstein was just a parody, not as much power; also motivated to depict contemporary life (missing from other art)
      • Lichtenstein reconciles cartoons and fine art, parody and feeling
    • List of elements in Lichtenstein's work that was taken from contemporary life:
      • Romances, war stories, automobiles, hot dogs, table lamps
    • Comparison with other pop art, according to author:
      • Lichtenstein’s work was different from with other pop art and late abstract expressionism because it expressed a naive nostalgia/sweetness
    • Author’s attitude: “it would possess only the reflective power that parodies have” (lines 33-34); “excess of sophistication” (lines 46); “an inner sweetness” (line 51); “faith in reconciliation” (line 53)

Main Point: Lichtenstein’s use of comic book styles made the depth in his work difficult to see, but he was able to successfully poke fun at the art world’s pretensions while also conveying a seriousness of theme and a naive nostalgia about contemporary life.

Key Lines?

Lines 5-10 - The Author’s overall view of Lichtenstein’s art and accomplishments

Lines 15-17 - Standard art history’s view on pop art’s origins

Lines 27-30 - How Lichtenstein fits into that history

Lines 35-38 - What made Lichtenstein’s art more than just parody

Lines 43-48 - Lichtenstein’s art compared to other pop art and abstract expressionism

Lines 52-55 - Closing opinion by the Author

Meta-Structure?

Importance of Subject: Some humanities passages don’t necessarily present an artist as being an innovator as much as they describe the importance of their work. These generally set the work in its historical context and discuss influences on the artist, but they focus on the accomplishments and characteristics of that artist’s work rather than what they did “first.” Here, the author starts by talking about Lichtenstein as someone who “helped to define pop art” (Lines 1-2), placing his work in its historical context. The author goes on to talk about the “complex result” of his work (Lines 5-10), before going on to flesh out the historical context of it (Paragraph 2). The author then explains how Lichtenstein’s work transcended mere parody (Lines 31-43) and contrasts Lichtenstein with previous and contemporary work (Lines 43-48) to highlight his specific achievement. When a passage falls into this Meta-Structure, the main point focuses on how the author characterizes the artist’s work and their accomplishments, leading to our anticipated main point above.

List: While a minor part of the passage, there’s a list of elements in Lichtenstein’s work in Lines 38-42. There will likely be a question that asks about this list.

Last Thoughts?

There were descriptions of several styles here, even splitting abstract expressionism and pop art into sub-styles, so we should have a general idea of each, as there will likely be questions about them:

  • Early abstract expressionism - Private emotions with nonrepresentational techniques (Lines 17-19)
  • Late abstract expressionism - As above, but “airy, high-minded, and overly lyrical” (Lines 24-25)
  • Pop art - Commonplace objects and commercial-art techniques (Lines 2-3)
  • Some pop art - Jaded cynicism about consumer culture (Line 44)
  • Lichtenstein - Pop art, but deliberate naivete, nostalgic, and sweet, with a focus on the depiction of contemporary life (Line 38; Line 45; Line 51)

Question prompt

The primary purpose of Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: B

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Humanities

Strategy Overview

Review the main point and any primary Meta-Structures we noted, then find an answer reflecting them

Answer Anticipation

A question that asks for a passage’s “primary purpose” asks us to select the answer choice that describes why the author wrote the passage. The correct answer will describe an action: what the author hoped to do in the passage and how the author accomplished that.Now, in a broad sense, every author hopes to convince us that the main point is true. However, different authors employ different means to convince us of that main point. That’s why the passage’s Meta-Structure can be revealing: it helps us predetermine how this specific author was attempting to convey the main point.In this case, the central Meta-Structure was Importance of Subject. The author argues that Lichtenstein both parodied earlier, pretentious art that was losing its emotional impact while also capturing contemporary life in a way that other artists were failing to do. So any answer that deals with discussing these reasons Lichtenstein was important should be considered, and we can then check any details against the passage.

Answer choices

  1. A
    express curiosity about an Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited

    (A) Does this answer choice line up with the Importance of Subject Meta-Structure and the author’s main point about Lichtenstein?

    Not exactly. Expressing curiosity would involve fewer conclusions and more questions. This passage presents a specific thesis on the accomplishments of Lichtenstein, so it’s less about curiosity and more about putting forward an argument.

  2. B
    clarify the motivation behind Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B matches the stem

    (B) Does this answer choice line up with the Importance of Subject Meta-Structure and the author’s main point about Lichtenstein?

    Yes! “[C]larify” certainly works for a passage that has a thesis about a specific artist’s work, so we should dig in here. Does the author discuss Lichtenstein’s motives? Absolutely! The author argues that Lichtenstein rebelled “against the fading emotional power of abstract expressionism” while presenting a missing “depiction of contemporary life.” So for each of Lichtenstein’s major accomplishments, the author brings up the motive behind it. While this wouldn’t have been the way we framed the purpose of the passage, it’s an accurate way of doing so, making this is the correct answer.

  3. C
    contrast two opposing theories Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited

    (C) Does this answer choice line up with the Importance of Subject Meta-Structure and the author’s main point about Lichtenstein?

    Nope. The author’s key thesis at the end of Paragraph 1 talks about how Lichtenstein did one thing and “also” another. So this passage doesn’t present two “opposing” theories. Both theories are part of the author’s overall view of his achievements.

  4. D
    describe the evolution of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited

    (D) Does this answer choice line up with the Importance of Subject Meta-Structure and the author’s main point about Lichtenstein?

    No. There are two problems here. First, the author makes a specific argument about Lichtenstein’s work, and the neutral verb here (“describe”) doesn’t capture that argument. Second, the author doesn’t go into the evolution of his work, talking about different stages of his development. Instead, the author talks about his work as a unified whole.

  5. E
    refute a previous overestimation Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited

    (E) Does this answer choice line up with the Importance of Subject Meta-Structure and the author’s main point about Lichtenstein?

    Nope. If the author refutes an “overestimation” of an artist’s work, then the author argues that the artist isn’t as great as others believe. This passage’s author is pretty sold on the value of Lichtenstein’s work and doesn’t present an opposing viewpoint that argues his work was even more important, so this answer is incorrect.

What this tests

Discussion

  • Answer Choice E 1 reply

    Started by rjaf123

  • Help 3 replies

    Started by TheFacu