One more follow up question.
Started by Batman · started 2013-12-04 19:37 · last activity 2013-12-04 23:55 · 2 replies
Your explanation led me to come closer to the answer. But I still do not agree that there are more premise than "we are not lost" in Rifka's argument. But the answer (b) says "one of premises", which implicitly means there are some more premises in Rifka's argument. I know my saying is a little bit picky though. Could you please one more try to explain about this micro issue??^^
Many thanks, always.