One more follow up question.

Started by Batman · started 2013-12-04 19:37 · last activity 2013-12-04 23:55 · 2 replies

Your explanation led me to come closer to the answer. But I still do not agree that there are more premise than "we are not lost" in Rifka's argument. But the answer (b) says "one of premises", which implicitly means there are some more premises in Rifka's argument. I know my saying is a little bit picky though. Could you please one more try to explain about this micro issue??^^ Many thanks, always.

Replies

  1. Mehran · 2013-12-04 21:03

    Whether there is more than one is completely irrelevant. There is at least one and that is all that matters for answer choice (B) to be correct. Not to mention that none of the other answer choices are even close. Hope this helps! Please let us know if you have any other questions.
  2. Batman · 2013-12-04 23:55

    I got it!!! Thanks a lot^^

Sign in to reply.