Submitting vs Exhibiting

Started by Kelsi-Grau · started 2018-08-15 22:15 · last activity 2021-05-29 21:44 · 6 replies

I marked answer choice B out because I thought that the fee referred to submitting their work, and there was an equal amount of each medium submitted, so it does not show a bias in what was actually exhibited in the show. Can someone clear this up for me?

Replies

  1. ddupray · 2018-09-03 03:29

    I have the same question!!
  2. Mehran · 2018-09-04 05:16

    Hi @Kelsi-Grau, @ddupray, thanks for your posts. All right: this stimulus presents a couple of different speakers, G and H. The question stem asks you to Strengthen G's argument, the conclusion of which is "the group of works exhibited in this year's Metropolitan Art Show reveals a bias in favor of photographers." What support does G provide for this claim of bias? (1) Equal numbers of photographers, sculptors, and painters submitted works that met the traditional criteria for the show, yet (2) more photographs were exhibited than either sculptures or paintings, even though (3) each artist was allowed to submit work in one medium only. Answer choice (B) would strengthen the argument that there was bias in favor of photographers. Why? Because if the fee for entry for photographs is lower ($25) than for painting or sculpture ($75), then the selection of more photos than paintings or sculptures is NOT because the latter raised more money for the show. In other words, answer choice (B) strengthens the argument in the stimulus by ruling out an alternative cause (cash flow). This bolster's G's argument that the cause of the noticed effect (that more photographs were exhibited than either sculptures or paintings) was bias. Hope this helps! Please let us know if you have any additional questions.
  3. Samantha-Alexis · 2019-06-02 04:53

    Thank you for the explanation. I also had the same questions as the students below. I ended up narrowing the answer choices down to answers A and B and ultimately chose answer A, which was incorrect. Now, I understand how answer (B) rules out an alternate cause, but then how is answer (A) incorrect?
  4. Ravi · 2019-06-02 16:25

    @Samantha-Alexis, Great question. (A) says, "If an artist has had one of his or her works exhibited in the Metropolitan Art Show, that artist has an advantage in getting commissions and selling works over artists who have never had a work exhibited in the show." The problem with (A) is that it gives us information about the advantages of being in a show, but it does not give us any information about how to get in the show. This is why (A) is incorrect. Does this make sense? Let us know if you have any other questions!
  5. grimadeau · 2020-05-15 20:20

    Can you explain alternate cause to me and how an answer choice is correct based on alter ante cause. I know that alternate cause weakens, so would be correct In weaken questions but how is alter ante cause relevant is strengthen ?
  6. sangagul1234ah@gmail.com · 2021-05-29 21:44

    not an instructor but in a strengthen question if all other Alternative causes are ruled out then the argument is strengthened since there is no other cause but the one proposed by the argument.

Sign in to reply.