PrepTest 118
[lcid:3570] Prep Test 118 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S3
Logical reasoning
Question prompt
An antidote for chicken
Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: E
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Paradox Questions
Answer choices
-
AThe drug is extremely Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Incorrect. The warning is against widespread use not the practicality of it so this answer doesn't provide an explanation. -
BThe drug has to Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. Even if compliance is low, those that do comply would be better off, so this doesn't provide a reason that widespread use could be dangerous. -
CThe drug does not Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. Even if it's not preventing the spread of the disease, reducing the harm once someone contracts it would be a good thing, so there's still no danger attached to the vaccine. -
DWhen misused by taking Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. This answer explains why misusing the drug is dangerous, but not why widespread usage is dangerous. Just limit it to being administered by a doctor and everything should be fine! -
EUse of the drug Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Facts
Question Type:
Paradox
Stimulus Summary:
A vaccine for chicken pox has no serious side effects and is effective against chicken pox
That vaccine is said to be dangerous if used widely
Answer Anticipation:
As with all Paradox questions, we should start by defining the paradox. Here, it's that researchers warn that a very effective vaccine is dangerous if widely used.
So there must be some threat posed by the vaccine when widely used other than its effectiveness against chicken pox and side effects. Maybe such widespread use causes some type of unexpected outcome. Let's stay open to any negative possibility here!
Answer Explanation:
This answer presents a potential negative consequence of the widespread use of the vaccine. If using it increases the odds of deadlier forms of vaccine—resistant chicken pox from forming, then using it more increases those odds even further, thus making it dangerous. This answer, in providing an outcome of the widespread vaccine use that presents a danger, resolves the paradox.
Key Takeaway:
This Paradox question falls into a common pattern—something is established as good but the experts warn that it's bad in some way. It will also sometimes have something established as "bad" but the experts state that it's actually "good" in some way. In either case, look for a negative or positive that the stimulus doesn't bring up!
What this tests
Discussion
No threads yet—be the first to ask a question or share an approach.