Question #1082

Diagramming Conditions

Started by Jack-Passero · started 2022-07-13 15:28 · last activity 2022-07-16 22:48 · 1 reply

For this question, I was somewhat lost when I had not assumed any of the answers, and I think it may be an error in my diagramming. I was wondering if there was a visual explanation on how to diagram a question like this? I had it as follows: I & FPU --> not O contrapositive: O --> not I or not FPU MA --> not FPU contrapositive: FPU --> not MA Based on these conditionals, I was unable to conclude anything, as they are separate conditions. I assume this means I either left something out, or I did not interpret the conditionals correctly; however, I am confused on which one of those it is.

Replies

  1. Emil-Kunkin · 2022-07-16 22:48

    Hi Jack, We know that If I/F ->U if Not U -> Not I/F We are also told that "modern architects violate this precept. I think that, by violating the above precept, we can conclude that modern architects make obtrusive buildings. Your diagram is correct, but this is a question where diagraming alone may not lead you to the correct answer.

Sign in to reply.