Answer D Misleading

Started by NULL · started 2024-05-07 00:29 · last activity 2024-05-22 13:18 · 2 replies

My question is in regard to the answer D which is correct, but I found it misleading and for that reason, I eliminated it off the bat. Answer D says: "It is in the interests of a nation that seeks deterrence and has unsurpassed military power to let potential aggressors against it become aware of its power of retaliatory attack." The issue as I see it, is the "unsurpassed military power" portion of the answer. A country does not have to have unsurpassed military power to seek or have deterrence. A country can be tiny and weak compared to many other countries, and be eyed for an attack by an even weaker enemy who will then be deterred for fear of retaliation. I believe that the "unsurpassed military power" is a conjecture easily done by a person from a country as big and powerful as the U.S. I eliminated D immediately because of this. Kindly, please let me know your thoughts and possible explanation in regard to this. Thank you.

Replies

  1. NULL · 2024-05-07 00:32

    P.S. I come from a very small country that experienced military conflict in my lifetime, so the "unsurpassed military power" immediately threw me off.
  2. Emil-Kunkin · 2024-05-22 13:18

    I think you need to read an answer like D more carefully. The answer isn't saying that a country needs to have unsurpassed power for deterrence. Rather it's saying that IF a country has such power, it's in their interests to let potential attackers know they have such power. This isn't conjecture, it's a hypothetical.

Sign in to reply.