PrepTest 119

[lcid:3575] Prep Test 119 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S4 Logical reasoning

Question prompt

Bookstore owner: Consumers should Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: B

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Principle Questions / Strengthen Questions / Sufficient & Necessary Questions

Answer choices

  1. A
    Chain bookstores should not Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited
    Incorrect. The conclusion in the stimulus is about what consumers should do, not what chain bookstores should do, so this principle is out of scope.
  2. B
    Consumers should buy books Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B matches the stem
    Correct. Argument or Facts:
    Argument

    Valid or Flawed:
    Flawed

    Question Type:
    Strengthen (Principle)

    Stimulus Summary:
    Recommendation - Consumers should buy books only from independent stores
    Reasoning - They carry a wider variety of books, and chains (in threatening indie stores) reduce the variety of books available

    Answer Anticipation:
    Strengthen (Principle) questions generally reach judgments in the conclusion that are backed up by details in the premises.

    Here, the conclusion takes the form of a recommendation—consumers should buy books only from independent stores. Why is this the case? Because buying from chain stores tends to reduce the variety of books available to consumers.

    However, the argument never establishes that consumers should care about variety! When making a recommendation, the criteria used to determine the proper action needs to be brought up. Here, the Owner is assuming a principle—that consumers should act in a way that maximizes the variety of options they have. However, it could be the case that consumers don't care about the variety of books they have available to them, instead prioritizing price or always having stock of popular books.

    As such, we should look for an answer establishing that the variety of books available as the determining factor in where consumers should buy books from.

    Answer Explanation:
    This answer establishes variety as the key determinant in where consumers should buy books. Chain stores do reduce the variety of books available to consumers, so this answer justifies not buying from them and instead buying from independent stores.

    Key Takeaway:
    When a conclusion makes a recommendation, always identify who the recommendation is aimed at. Here, it was a recommendation made to consumers. As such, any answer that talked about what a different group "should" do could be eliminated as out of scope.
  3. C
    The best interest of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited
    Incorrect. This answer is about the interests of the bookselling industry, not the consumers, so it's out of scope in an argument about what those consumers should do.
  4. D
    Consumers should not make Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited
    Incorrect. There's no discussion of the chain stores deliberately putting other stores out of business, so this answer doesn't necessarily apply to the situation described in the stimulus.
  5. E
    If consumers have no Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited
    Incorrect. The Owner's conclusion is about buying from independent stores, so buying from chain stores—no matter what the conditions are that lead to it—runs counter to it.

What this tests

Discussion

  • Explanation 8 replies

    Started by Selina