PrepTest 119
[lcid:3575] Prep Test 119 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S4
Logical reasoning
Question prompt
Psychologist: There are theories
Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: B
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Strengthen with Necessary Premise Questions
Answer choices
-
AFreudian theories have offered Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Incorrect. Freud's theory doesn't need to make false suggestions for it to be disfavored compared to others—the argument just relies on the predictions about human behavior to be less accurate. -
BA psychological theory with Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Argument
Valid or Flawed:
Flawed
Question Type:
Strengthen with Necessary Premise
Stimulus Summary:
Other theories make more accurate predictions than Freud's theories, so we should throw Freud's theories out in favor of the other theories.
Answer Anticipation:
The argument recommends scrapping a theory for another set. Why? Because those other theories make more accurate predictions about human behavior.
Whenever an argument makes a recommendation, it needs to establish the criteria by which that recommendation can be made. Here, to conclude that we should throw out one theory in favor of another, it would need to be established what makes a theory better.
Here, the argument fails to do so. Instead, it compares Freud's theory to others along a single metric—how well the theory can predict human behavior. While Freud's theory is worse in this regard than others, there's no indication that this is the key element of a psychological theory.
Therefore, the argument is assuming that theories that can more accurately predict human behavior should be used and those that make less accurate predictions should be abandoned. Let's find an answer establishing this as the relevant criteria.
Answer Explanation:
This answer establishes accurate predictions on human behavior as the key element in determining which of several psychological theories is preferable. Since the stimulus establishes other theories beat Freud's on this metric, this answer is correct. If such predictions aren't scientifically preferable, then the argument falls apart.
Key Takeaway:
Whenever an argument makes a recommendation in the conclusion, be sure that a premise establishes what criteria need to be considered to make that recommendation. Here, there was no premise that said when one theory should be abandoned in favor of another, and so we needed to look for that in an answer choice. -
CFreudian theory has had Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. The argument relies on these other theories being more successful, which doesn't require that Freud's theories have had little success. They could be fairly successful, but the new theories are even moreso. -
DMeasuring the predictive success Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. The stimulus establishes as a fact that the predictive success of certain theories beats that of Freud's. It doesn't matter what methods are used to make that determination! -
EScientific theories become impractical Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Incorrect. The conclusion of the argument says that Freud's theories should be abandoned "no matter how . . . complex they are," so that considers the possibility that they're not very complex at all, and thus this answer isn't a requirement for the argument to hold.
What this tests
Discussion
-
Started by Tyler808
-
The explanation 0 replies
Started by bobbyg0313
-
Answer Choice 2 replies
Started by Melody