Question #1033

Circular reasoning in Answer Choice D

Started by Brett-Lindsay · started 2020-07-07 03:56 · last activity 2020-07-13 19:21 · 5 replies

Answer choice D reads: Every postimpressionist painting from the Huang Collection will be auctioned off next week. No pop art paintings from the Huang Collection will be auctioned off next week. Hence none of the pop art paintings to be auctioned off next week will be from the Huang Collection. I diagrammed it as follows: PImp(H) --> ANW not ANW --> not PImp(H) Pop(H) --> not ANW ANW --> not Pop(H) PImp(H) --> ANW --> not Pop(H) which gives us the conclusion that Huang's postimpressionist paintings are not Huang's pop art paintings: PImp(H) --> not Pop(H) Is this what is meant by circular reasoning?

Replies

  1. shunhe · 2020-07-07 17:04

    Hi @Brett-Lindsay, Thanks for the question! So the “circular reasoning” here actually alludes to the fact that the conclusion basically relies on itself in the premises. Here, we see that the conclusion basically restates the second premise. So thinking the conclusion is true requires thinking that the second premise is true, but the second premise is the conclusion. So if you think that the conclusion’s true, you’re committing circular reasoning. In general, circular reasoning occurs when the conclusion assumes itself in the premises. A better example often used involves religion. Here’s an argument: The Bible is the word of God The Bible says God exists. Conclusion: God exists. From a purely logical point of view, this is a circular argument. Why? Because the first premise, the Bible is the word of God, relies on assuming that God exists. So you’re using the fact that God exists to prove that God exists, and this is circular reasoning. Hope this helps! Feel free to ask any other questions that you might have.

  2. Brett-Lindsay · 2020-07-08 04:35

    Thanks @shunhe, I think I get it. I certainly get the Bible example. So, to clarify, anytime we simply restate one of the premises without adding anything of value, we're engaging in circular reasoning? Thanks.

  3. shunhe · 2020-07-09 17:00

    Basically, anytime the conclusion restates a premise, yes. Since the conclusion is then relying on the truth of that premise to itself be true.

  4. Brett-Lindsay · 2020-07-11 01:40

    Awesome! Thanks, @shunhe

  5. shunhe · 2020-07-13 19:21

    You're welcome!

Sign in to reply.