Premise #2 of this question
Started by
hassay18
· started 2024-02-22 20:10
· last activity 2025-01-13 15:56
· 2 replies
How does "Pr 2: But no expert is certain to be able to solve someone else's problem." conclude that this premise tells us that if someone is able to solve someone else's problem, he is no psychology expert. The premise just means that no expert is - with 100% certainty - able to so solve someone else's problem.
-
Emil-Kunkin
· 2024-02-22 22:00
The premise does not tell us that if someone is able to solve someone else's problem then the solver is not an expert. Where do you see that? Your interpretation in the last sentence is correct.
-
gabriellaportelli
· 2025-01-13 15:56
Isn't the statement - "But no expert is certain to be able to solve someone else's problem" a sufficient condition? Why can this statement also be reversed and negated? I assumed it could not be reversed & negated but the solution suggests we must reverse & negate.
Sign in to reply.