How do I know this is a set of facts compared to an argument?
Started by
hannahnaylor5
· started 2019-07-18 03:03
· last activity 2022-12-23 16:57
· 3 replies
It seemed like an argument based on the first sentence, which I thought was the conclusion of the argument. Is this not an opinion?
-
Lib
· 2020-08-27 19:34
that's what I thought as well... wondering the same thing.. but then when I worked through the logic diagram the supposed "conclusion" didn't fit into the logic chain.. I figured then that the true conclusion with where the logic was going was implied rather than directly state. Just my thoughts on the matter
-
Julia96
· 2022-09-14 16:02
Hi, LSATMax! I was also hoping to have advice on this. I sometimes struggle to differentiate an argument from a set of facts on the LSAT. Are we primarily looking for key word indicators?
-
Emil-Kunkin
· 2022-12-23 16:57
Hi, we should look for a conclusion. An argument has a conclusion, a thing that the author is trying to prove. A set of facts will not have a conclusion. More so, must be true, cannot be true, and paradox questions are sets of facts, the others are almost all arguments.
Sign in to reply.