Question #1020

Answer Choice B (S&N language)

Started by mmanetti · started 2021-07-27 17:23 · last activity 2021-08-23 14:41 · 2 replies

Answer choice B states: "We can conclude that the Hillside police department has improved its efficiency, because crime rates are down in Hillside, and it is an established fact that crime rates go down when police departments increase their efficiency." From this I had: P: increased efficiency --> decreased crime rate C: increased efficiency --> decreased crime rate I don't understand how the premise is supposed to be : P: decreased crime rate --> increased efficiency I originally had the correct premise written down, but I changed it after I saw the S&N indicator word when, which should indicate a sufficient condition follows. Can you please explain?

Replies

  1. Karen-Norris · 2021-08-23 14:28

    I have the exact same question as above. My initial instinct was to write for the first sentence, decreased crime rate --> (we can conclude) increased efficiency. But then I thought perhaps I was correcting what was supposed to be a flawed argument, so when I wrote it out using "when" as a sufficient indicator.

  2. Karen-Norris · 2021-08-23 14:41

    Let me correct that. I wrote the second sentence as a premise: When Increased Efficiency --> Crime rates decreased. I saw the first sentence as the conclusion of the argument, and at first read it as Improved Efficiency --> Crime decreased. Would it be correct to read the first sentence as, "(because) crime decreased --> (therefore) increased efficiency? Using the words because/therefore to test which statement is supporting which?

Sign in to reply.