PrepTest 113
[lcid:3551] Prep Test 113 LSAT — Logical Reasoning — S4
Logical reasoning
Question prompt
Lydia: Red squirrels are
Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: E
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Argument or Facts
Argument/Argument
Valid or Flawed
Flawed/Flawed
Question Type
Methods of Reasoning Questions
Stimulus Summary
L: Phenomenon - Red squirrels make holes in sugar maple trees and drink the sap
Potential explanations - They’re after sugar or water (the only components of the sap)
Premise - Water is easily available elsewhere in the area
Conclusion - They’re probably after the sugar
G: There’s so little sugar in the sap, so they’re probably after something other than sugar.
Answer Anticipation
Lydia’s argument falls into a common pattern, and when that happens in a Methods of Reasoning question, we can frame our anticipation around the pattern! Here, she brings up a phenomenon and attempts to explain it.
How does she go about explaining it? She brings up two possible explanations that she believes are the only ones, rules one out, and then concludes the other is probably the true explanation. Let’s find an answer reflecting that.
Answer choices
-
Adismissing potentially disconfirming data
Why choice A is not credited
Lydia rules out an explanation, but that’s different from dismissing data. -
Bciting a general rule Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
There’s no general rule presented by Lydia. -
Cpresenting an observed action Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
She attempts to explain a single behavior, not relate it to the wider behavior of red squirrels. -
Ddrawing an analogy between Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
There’s no analogy or separate situation raised here, so this answer is completely off base. -
Erejecting a possible alternative Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E matches the stem
Lydia concludes one explanation for an observed phenomenon is probably true based on ruling out what she believes to be the only likely alternative, so this answer is correct.
What this tests
Discussion
-
Timing 2 replies
Started by JakeHill
-
Why not c 1 reply
Started by dianalazar
-
Question 8: either/or and both 2 replies
Started by ponyo