Question #1018

Answer B Explanation

Started by Valentina · started 2020-07-14 20:30 · last activity 2020-12-24 00:15 · 2 replies

How come, in the passage (and I'm assuming in other passages on the LSAT), we can manipulate the variables (L2%NY & MSSL) by negating them to create an argument structure, but we can't do the same in Answer B? In other words, why cant the variable "reduce shoplifting" be the same as NOT "suffer reduced profits"? How are we able to decipher a phrase as the logical opposite of a variable?

Replies

  1. Valentina · 2020-07-19 03:14

    Hi again, just bringing this back up. Thanks!

  2. AlejandroCantu7 · 2020-12-24 00:15

    ^^^

Sign in to reply.