KAE (V). SK
Started by Julia96 · started 2023-09-06 02:24 · last activity 2023-09-12 02:12 · 1 reply
The answer became clear when I saw the politician's claim diagrammed as /D --> /KAE.
However, I first diagrammed the politician's claim as follows: /D --> SK.
My trouble in finding the correct answer stemmed from the politician's necessary condition not matching the necessary condition from the biologist's claim.
It seems in most S&N questions, diagramming the differences in subtle language are usually essential in selecting the correct answer (i.e. meaning we would interpret "slowing deforestation" differently from "stopping deforestation").
In short, why in this case did paraphrase "If the forest continues to disappear at its present pace" and "stop deforestation" to mean the same thing.
The LSAT usually wants us to be very intentional in diagramming differences in language. What about this question is/should be leading us to interpret the necessary conditions of both parties as being the same?
I have struggled with understanding this for over the year I've studied and a response would be immensely appreciated