Logical reasoning PrepTest 157 · Section 3 · Question 11
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: A
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Argument or Facts
Valid or Flawed
Strategy Overview
Answer Anticipation
Answer choices
-
AIt is a claim Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A matches the stem
There it is. We're looking for an answer choice that says the second sentence is a premise that supports the main conclusion. This answer choice says just that. Since we have a precise anticipation for this question and (A) matches that anticipation, we can confidently select (A) and advance to the following question.
-
BIt is presented to Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Nope. The second sentence supports the argument's conclusion (by ruling out another way that sexual reproduction could have become the norm among species). So, the second sentence doesn't "shed[] doubt" (cast doubt) on the conclusion. It makes the conclusion more likely to be true!
-
CIt is a claim Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Nope. The second sentence supports the argument's conclusion (by ruling out another way that sexual reproduction could have become the norm among species). So, the argument doesn't call the second sentence into question! The second sentence makes the argument more convincing!
-
DIt describes an observed Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Nope. The second sentence isn't an observed phenomenon. We can't walk out into nature and see that an increased range of genetic variation in a species is not advantageous for any individual member of the species. And even if the second sentence was a phenomenon, the conclusion doesn't explain that phenomenon. Instead, the conclusion uses that supposed "phenomenon" to rule out an alternative way that sexual reproduction could have become the norm among species.
-
EIt is presented as Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Nope. The second sentence isn't an explanation for any other supposed "phenomenon" in this argument. Besides, when an argument has a Phenomenon/Explanation structure, the explanation is always the conclusion. The second sentence is a premise, which shows that it can't be a conclusion.
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
No threads yet—be the first to ask a question or share an approach.