Logical reasoning PrepTest 149 · Section 3 · Question 10
Question prompt
The prehistoric fish Tiktaalik
Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: E
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Must Be True Questions
Answer choices
-
ATiktaalik likely used its Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Incorrect. An animal could be an ancestor to an animal with a trait or behavior that it doesn't share. It's possible the Tiktaalik lived exclusively in water, and species that evolved from it moved to land. -
BTiktaalik's fingers were its Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. There's no language strong enough to support that the fingers were the only significant evolution in the Tiktaalik. -
CTiktaalik is not the Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. While the Tiktaalik is noted as being an ancestor to many land animals, it may also be ancestor to fish species (they may have devolved away from having fingers). -
DNo fish without fingers Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. There's no discussion of fish moving on land, so this answer is unsupported. -
EThe evolutionary significance of Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Argument
Valid or Flawed:
Flawed
Question Type:
Must Be True
Stimulus Summary:
Tiktaalik are prehistoric fish with fingers. Prehistoric fish were all weird so the Tiktaalik wouldn't have stood out, but they proved to be important evolutionarily.
Answer Anticipation:
There are a few elements in this Must Be True stimulus that we can look to for our anticipation because they fall into categories of statements that tend to lead to inferences.
Noting that the Tiktaalik is "the earliest" known example of an animal with fingers is a strong comparison—as far as we know, it had fingers before anything else. The stimulus also compares the Tiktaalik to other fish—it wouldn't have stood out because they were all unusual. And we finally get a bit of an unexpected statement—this fish evolved into land animals.
This is a bit of a mishmash of information and it's unclear what inference can be drawn from it, but noting these elements should help us when we see an answer that deals in these concepts.
Answer Explanation:
This answer is a bit of a generalization from the stimulus. The Tiktaalik is noted as not standing out from other fish at the time while eventually proving to be important evolutionarily, thus supporting this answer.
Key Takeaway:
Sometimes, it's more important to understand the important information in a Must Be True question than it is to have a specific anticipation. Don't force yourself to come up with an anticipation if you're not seeing one—head to the answers and find an answer that's related to the important statements you identified.
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.