Logical reasoning PrepTest 148 · Section 3 · Question 22

Question prompt

The return of organic Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: C

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Flawed Parallel Reasoning Questions

Answer choices

  1. A
    Plants thrive if they Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited
    Incorrect. Moisture AND Light AND Nutrients → Thrive. The argument then establishes that plants in greenhouses get these sufficient conditions, so there's no illegal reversal.
  2. B
    When every country has Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited
    Incorrect. Every country has equal access → Globalization allows optimization. The argument then establishes this sufficient condition will be met in 20 years, so there's no illegal reversal.
  3. C
    To be viable, a Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C matches the stem
    Correct. Argument or Facts:
    Argument

    Valid or Flawed:
    Flawed

    Question Type:
    Flawed Parallel Reasoning

    Stimulus Summary:
    Return of organic waste good → Nontoxic AND Not too much energy on transportation
    Small-scale organic farming: Nontoxic AND Not too much energy on transportation
    Therefore, in small-scale organic farming, returning organic waste to the soil is good.

    Answer Anticipation:
    In diagramming this stimulus out, we can see that the argument commits an illegal reversal. The correct answer should do the same. Note that, unlike a Parallel Reasoning question, not all elements of the stimulus need to match up, so we don't need a conditional that has two necessary conditions linked with AND.

    Answer Explanation:
    Viable → Clear AND Cost-effective AND Practical AND Responsive. Your website has these 4 properties, so it'll be viable. This answer commits the same illegal reversal. Note again that, even though there are 4 necessary conditions instead of the 2 from the stimulus, it still commits the same flaw, so that mismatch doesn't rule this answer out. If this were a Parallel Reasoning question, it'd be a different story.

    Key Takeaway:
    Flawed Parallel Reasoning questions only need the elements that create the flaw to line up. As long as the same flaw is committed, it doesn't matter if there are additional terms or premises, unlike in Parallel Reasoning questions.
  4. D
    Those competitors-and only those-who Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited
    Incorrect. This argument sets up a biconditional ("Those . . . and only those"), and it establishes that one of the conditions is met, so there's no illegal reversal. In fact, there can't be an illegal reversal in a biconditional.
  5. E
    A meal is nutritious Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited
    Incorrect. Nutritious → Carbs AND Protein. Lunch: 80% calories from fat . . . which doesn't line up with either condition, so this answer features a term shift instead of a reversal. In fact, it tries to apply the contrapositive.

What this tests

Question analytics

Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.

Answer choice distribution

  1. A 9%
  2. B 12%
  3. C Credited 57%
  4. D 16%
  5. E 6%

Deeper help

Ask follow-ups on any step

Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.

Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.

Discussion