Reading comp PrepTest 148 · Section 2 · Question 9

Passage

This passage was adapted from an article written by three economists.  .       Roughly 40 percent of the African American  . Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary

Topic: Social Science


Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph note
    • A phenomenon is introduced and 3 causes are listed
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Phenomenon - Great Migration - 40% of African American population South for North (1915-1960)
    • 3 causes (all related to labor) - WWI, decrease in immigration, boll weevils in South

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph note
    • 3 causes/phenomenon summed up, and a question is posed
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Summary - North-South income gap so big it kicked off migration
    • Question - Why did it continue/accelerate as income gap narrowed?

Paragraph 3

  • Paragraph note
    • Authors’s view presented, and some background research
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Authors (Explanation/Answer) - Momentum develops as migrants make it easier for others to migrate
    • Economist (assumption) - Additional earnings exceed migration costs → People migrate
    • List of migration costs (uncertainty of housing/job; moving costs; familiarization of new location)

Paragraph 4

  • Paragraph note
    • Authors show how these costs are lowered as migration continues
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Empirical studies - Letters provided potential migrants info
    • New migrants traveled with old (lower moving costs)
    • New migrants stayed with old (easier to adapt to new area)

Main Point: By helping with moving costs and familiarization with a new location and its job and housing markets, previous migrants lowered the cost of migration for future migrants, explaining the continued and accelerating migration of African Americans even after the North-South income gap narrowed.

Key Lines?

Lines 1-4 - A phenomenon is noted

Lines 7-8 - A list is introduced (causes of phenomenon)

Lines 19-22 - A question about the phenomenon is introduced

Lines 23-25 - The Authors’s answer/explanation is previewed

Lines 25-29 - An assumption of relevant experts is noted

Lines 29-31 - Another list is introduced (factors in migration cost)

Paragraph 4 - The assumptions are addressed to support the explanation

Meta-Structure?

Question/Answer and Phenomenon/Explanation - The passage is meant to answer a question about an unexpected aspect of a phenomenon. While the “topic” of the passage is itself a phenomenon - the Great Migration - the Authors raise a question about it in Paragraph 2 that the passage is designed to answer/explain: Why did the migration continue/accelerate even when the driving force behind it lessened? (Lines 19-22). The rest of the passage is designed to answer that question and explain the phenomenon - momentum, as earlier migrants lowered the costs associated with future migration (Lines 23-25). And since the Author’s answer to a question or explanation for a phenomenon is usually the main point of the passage, we should check to see if it serves that purpose here. Since the rest of the passage is meant to highlight support for that answer, we can conclude that it is the main point.

Last Thoughts?

The Authors raise the assumptions of Economists here. Normally, when an assumption is pointed out, it’s to highlight a weakness in an argument, and that assumption is attacked or undermined. Here, however, the Authors use the implications of the assumption to build their argument. In this case, the assumption operates more as a generally accepted theory that the Authors apply.

Also, the Authors speak in the first-person (“We propose”; Line 23). When that happens, it’s important to note as it tells us that the Authors are taking a proactive role in the passage, and there’s a good chance that a question will reflect on that.

Question prompt

The third and fourth Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: D

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Humanities

Strategy Overview

Review what we said about the roles of Paragraphs 3 and 4 and how they function in the overall passage, then find an answer matching that

Answer Anticipation

After we read each paragraph, we should spend a few seconds thinking about its role in the overall passage, and how the passage is developing. We can also jot down a note or two to that effect to help with questions such as this one.After reading them, we said that the role of these paragraphs is:Paragraph 3 - Present the Authors’s view and some background/expert research into the factors in costs associated with migrationParagraph 4 - Show how the research supports their view by arguing how earlier migration lowers the costs/factors associated with it Both were there to explain the unexpected aspect of the Great Migration - its duration and acceleration even after its base causes decreased. Let’s find an answer reflecting this.

Answer choices

  1. A
    cast doubt upon a Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited

    (A) (Lines 16-19) The Authors agree with the explanation presented in Paragraph 1 as to the initial causes of the Great Migration. They then go on to explain a puzzling aspect of it.

  2. B
    survey the repercussions of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited

    (B) The passage doesn’t discuss the legacy of the Great Migration and what impact it had on the North/South/US.

  3. C
    derive a historical model Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited

    (C) (Lines 19-22) Paragraph 2 ends by shifting the passage in a new direction. Paragraph 1 and the first half of Paragraph 2 are about the initial causes of the Great Migration. Paragraphs 3 and 4 are about the causes of its acceleration and duration. As such, the information in Paragraph 1 and 2 don’t speak directly to the discussion in Paragraphs 3 and 4.

  4. D
    answer a question raised Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D matches the stem

    (D) (Lines 16-19) In presenting something that is “[l]ess clear,” the Authors imply a question - what caused migration to continue and accelerate as the North-South income gap narrowed? Paragraphs 3 and 4 answer that question - momentum, as earlier migrants lower the cost for future migrants. This answer reflects the role of the last two paragraphs in relation to the passage as a whole (and it reflects our common argument pattern!), so this is the correct answer.

  5. E
    provide additional evidence for Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited

    (E) Paragraph 1 is about the Great Migration and its initial causes. Paragraphs 3 and 4 are about the factors that led to it lasting for decades and even accelerating. This answer therefore misses the mark in describing the relationship between these paragraphs.

What this tests

Question analytics

Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.

Answer choice distribution

  1. A 1%
  2. B 3%
  3. C 4%
  4. D Credited 85%
  5. E 7%

Deeper help

Ask follow-ups on any step

Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.

Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.

Discussion