Logical reasoning PrepTest 146 · Section 1 · Question 16
Question prompt
In most of this
Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: A
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Strengthen Questions
Answer choices
-
Amore than half of Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Argument
Valid or Flawed:
Flawed
Question Type:
Argument Completion (Strengthen)
Stimulus Summary:
A tussock moth outbreak is beneficial where forests are unnaturally crowded with immature trees, and __________, so the expected outbreak shouldn't be stopped.
Answer Anticipation:
The argument concludes that a certain event should be allowed to take place because it's beneficial under certain circumstances. To strengthen that argument, then, it should be established that those circumstances apply to the current case! The correct answer should establish that in most of the forest, suppression of forest fires has resulted in overcrowding with immature trees.
Answer Explanation:
This answer establishes that the situation under which a moth outbreak is beneficial applies in most of the forest, thus justifying the recommendation to let the outbreak happen.
Key Takeaway:
While this stimulus isn't conditional, the flaw in the argument very much is related to one that we commonly see in conditional arguments. There, outside of conditional logic flaws, arguments that try to apply the conditional to a specific instance commonly fail to establish that the sufficient condition is met in that instance. Here, similarly, it's established that something is beneficial in certain cases, but it fails to establish that this case falls into that category. Always make sure that the argument establishes that the relevant premises apply in any specific case being discussed! -
Bmature trees are usually Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. Without knowing the makeup of the forest in question, this answer doesn't help. That said, if anything, it suggests a reason that the tussock moths might not be beneficial in a mixed growth forest, which cuts against the recommendation in the conclusion without knowing more about the forest. -
Cusually a higher proportion Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. This might explain why suppression of forest fires can lead to a problem, but it doesn't establish that the forest in question has that problem. -
Dthe expected outbreak of Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. This answer doesn't add much since the recommendation was to do nothing to stop it. It also doesn't establish that they'll be beneficial to this forest. -
Ethere are no completely Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Incorrect. If anything, this is a reason to prevent an outbreak if possible since once they're out there isn't a way to completely counter them.
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.