Logical reasoning PrepTest 145 · Section 4 · Question 10

Question prompt

Columnist: Some people argue Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: D

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Cannot Be True Questions

Answer choices

  1. A
    Commanding a branch of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited
    Incorrect. The stimulus establishes that running the military is "at least as great" a "responsibility" as running a bank. That doesn't rule out the possibility that running the military requires more knowledge. While this answer is unsupported, it's possible, and this is a Cannot Be True question.
  2. B
    Politicians do an adequate Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited
    Incorrect. Since the Columnist is using their experience appointing military officials to highlight how they could do the same for a bank in rebuttal to those who would argue against the government running the banks, this answer very much aligns with the statements in the stimulus and thus isn't contradicted.
  3. C
    Politicians are not capable Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited
    Incorrect. The Columnist says that politicians wouldn't need to do this, so this answer is compatible with her argument.
  4. D
    Banks that are owned Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D matches the stem
    Correct. Argument or Facts:
    Argument

    Valid or Flawed:
    Flawed

    Question Type:
    Cannot Be True

    Stimulus Summary:
    Opposing point Ð Government shouldn't take over failing banks because it doesn't have expertise running banks
    Columnist Ð They appoint military leaders to run the military despite most politicians lacking experience there, so they could do the same for banks.

    Answer Anticipation:
    Cannot Be True questions task us with finding something that cannot be true in an argument—in other words, it has to be contradicted by the information provided. Generally, the stimulus is a series of facts, and we can identify statements that are likely to lead to contradictory answers. However, here, we're given an argument/debate, so we can start our analysis of each answer by seeing if it's something the Columnist has an opinion on and would disagree with. If we can find that, we likely have our answer.

    The Columnist believes that it's possible for the government to appoint people to run a bank it takes over and run it well, much as they do for the military. Any answer that runs counter to that argument should be considered.

    Answer Explanation:
    The Columnist believes that government officials could appoint competent leaders to the bank, much as they do the military. Therefore, she believes that it's possible for a bank owned by the government to be well managed, contradicting this answer.

    Key Takeaway:
    Don't forget that Cannot Be True questions have correct answers that are contradicted by the stimulus, not answers that are merely unsupported by it. Additionally, it's easier to contradict a strong/absolute statement (here, "cannot" is akin to saying it's impossible), so when you see strong language in an answer choice, pay closer attention!
  5. E
    The government should not Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited
    Incorrect. The debate is around banks that are failing, so other banks are out of scope and thus almost anything an answer could say about them would be possibly true.

What this tests

Question analytics

Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.

Answer choice distribution

  1. A 10%
  2. B 5%
  3. C 6%
  4. D Credited 74%
  5. E 5%

Deeper help

Ask follow-ups on any step

Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.

Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.

Discussion