Logical reasoning PrepTest 145 · Section 2 · Question 10

Question prompt

One year ago, a Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: C

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Argument Evaluation Questions

Answer choices

  1. A
    Why did many residents Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited
    Incorrect. The argument is just about whether people did or did not switch, not why some did not switch.
  2. B
    What pollutants, if any, Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited
    Incorrect. The benefits or downsides of the switch are out of scope—it's just about whether the switch was made by some residents.
  3. C
    Were any changes made Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C matches the stem
    Correct. Argument or Facts:
    Argument

    Valid or Flawed:
    Flawed

    Question Type:
    Argument Evaluation

    Stimulus Summary:
    A city banned phosphate-based detergents. Some people might have bought them from out of town, but the amount of phosphates at the water treatment plant went down, so others must have switched to non-phosphate detergents.

    Answer Anticipation:
    The argument notes a phenomenon—phosphate pollution at the water treatment plant went down last year—and attributes a cause of it—some people obeyed the law and switched to a non-phosphate-based detergent.

    Whenever an argument concludes a causal explanation for a phenomenon, you should immediately start thinking about alternative causes. Any question that asks about a potential alternative cause will help in evaluating this argument.

    Answer Explanation:
    This answer hints at an alternative cause of the decrease in phosphate pollution. If the municipality did make changes to their method of water treatment, then that might explain the change in phosphate levels. If they didn't, then a potential alternative cause is ruled out. Either answer would affect the argument and thus help us evaluate it.

    Key Takeaway:
    Argument Evaluation questions will frequently have answers that ask questions. Different answers should have a different effect on the argument, and all answers should have an effect. When that's the case, you'll know you have the right answer.
  4. D
    Does most of the Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited
    Incorrect. The waterways are out of scope of the argument—the noted metric is that the phosphates in the wastewater at the water treatment plant decreased.
  5. E
    Did municipal officials try Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited
    Incorrect. Attempts to stop people from bringing in the phosphate-based detergents are out of scope, and the argument is about those who didn't run out of town to buy the phosphate-based detergents, anyway.

What this tests

Question analytics

Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.

Answer choice distribution

  1. A 3%
  2. B 3%
  3. C Credited 68%
  4. D 23%
  5. E 4%

Deeper help

Ask follow-ups on any step

Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.

Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.

Discussion

  • Why not B? 1 reply

    Started by iris.diaz823

  • Option D 2 replies

    Started by Minerva

  • Question 1 reply

    Started by claire_crites