Reading comp PrepTest 143 · Section 2 · Question 6
Passage
Passage walkthrough
Paragraph 1
- Paragraph note
- A phenomenon is introduced that has divided anthropologists
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Old problem - Eliminate colonial gaze in ethnographic film
- New phenomenon - Indigenous cultures are getting cameras and recording their own cultures
- Anthropologists are "sharply divided" on how to view this
- Paragraph note
- One view is described
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Weiner et. al. - Cameras are an assault on indigenous cultures
- Devalues differences, pushing Western approach (realism, immediacy, self-expression)
- Paradox - Costs indigenous peoples the culture they want to preserve
- Weiner - Others who think this is good are naïve
- Paragraph note
- Other view is described
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Ginsburg et. al. - Weiner appeals to "noble savage" (super negative)
- Concession - Western objects aren't neutral
- Non-Western peoples can adopt this tech without Western values
- Opportunity to preserve language and traditions
- Paragraph note
- A real-world example backs up Ginsburg's view
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Ex. Turner/Kayapo (oral tradition) - Back up Ginsburg
- Kayapo record ceremonies and interactions with government (legally binding)
- Kayapo videos/editing reflect their culture/ceremonies (complex patterns; repetition; sequential organization)
While there is a sharp debate between anthropologists on whether it's good for indigenous cultures to adopt Western technology/cameras, a real-world example suggests that this technology does more harm than good, at least as far as preserving their culture is concerned.
Key Lines:
Lines 8-10 - The phenomenon is introduced
Lines 11-12 - The debate is previewed
Lines 13-15 - The first side of the debate is introduced and outlined
Lines 32-34 - The second side of the debate makes a concession to the first
Lines 34-36 - The second side of the debate rebuts the first
Lines 40-43 - The second side of the debate is outlined
Lines 44-47 - A specific example is introduced that supports the second view
Lines 54-59 - The best line describing the example's relevance
Meta-Structure:
Phenomenon/Implication - This is a variation on the Phenomenon/Explanation pattern. However, there's no explanation for the phenomenon here—the adoption of cameras by indigenous peoples. The debate is over whether it's a good or a bad thing.
Debate - Two sides of a debate are outlined. Here, the Author ends up leaning towards one side.
General Point/Specific Example - The Author brings up a single example to back up the viewpoint that she most closely aligns with. Remember, when a single example serves as the backing for a view, that view isn't on the strongest ground!
Last Thoughts:
That discussion of "ontology" is probably going to show up as at least an answer, since it's not a word you hear every day!
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: D
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Answer choices
-
AWeiner fails to recognize Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Incorrect. (Lines 45-46) Turner's work focuses only on the Kayapo, and there are no statements made through Turner's viewpoint talking about other indigenous peoples or indigenous peoples generally. -
BWeiner overestimates the extent Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. (Line 46) The Kayapo have access to video technology, so how much more widely spread the technology is is out of scope of Turner's argument. It's also out of scope of Weiner's—he cares only about the effects on indiginous cultures where the technology has spread, not how far it's spread. -
CWeiner does not fully Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. (Lines 23-25) Weiner does believe there's value to preserving these traditional practices—he just believes that video actually subverts that goal. And Turner doesn't speak to Weiner's view on this, anyway. -
DWeiner underestimates indigenous peoples' Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D matches the stem
Correct. Question Type:
Must Be True
Strategy Overview:
Review Terence Turner's viewpoint, Weiner's viewpoint, and then infer what the former would think of the latter
Answer Anticipation/Relevant Lines:
The structure of this passage is nice—a new viewpoint is introduced and, more or less, contained in each paragraph.
Terence Turner showed up in Paragraph 4—he's the field anthropologist who worked with the Kayapo. His work "lends credence to Ginsburg's position" (Line 47), which stands in opposition to Weiner's. And, specifically, Turner has found that the Kayapo videos, on all levels, mirror their principles and ceremonies. In short, they've managed to use the Western camera but end up with a product that reflects themselves.
Weiner (Paragraph 2) believes that this isn't possible. The Author says he believes cameras "inevitably purvey a Western ontology" (Line 21), and so a non-Western culture using one would lose their own viewpoint and necessarily adopt a Western one.
That's at odds with Turner's observations of the Kayapo maintaining their own principles and culture while using the camera, so the correct answer should reflect that.
Answer Explanation:
(Lines 56-60; Lines 20-21) Weiner believes that video "inevitably" causes indigenous peoples to adopt a Western ontology, costing them their cultural identity. Turner, on the other hand, has worked with an indiginous culture that was able to capture their culture in video that reflected their own values, not Western ones. As such, Turner would believe that Weiner underestimates the ability of indiginous peoples to adapt video technology to their own cultural values, since Weiner believes it can't be done and Turner has seen the Kayapo do just that.
Key Takeaway:
Fun question! We needed to understand two non-Author viewpoints to answer it. However, we know that the various viewpoints are important, so we should have started this question with a general view of what Turner's and Weiner's viewpoints were, and where to find the details of them in the passage. -
EWeiner ignores the fact Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Incorrect. There are no other specific technologies discussed in the passage, and certainly not in the paragraph describing Turner's views.
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
No threads yet—be the first to ask a question or share an approach.