Reading comp PrepTest 139 · Section 2 · Question 19
Passage
Passage walkthrough
Topic: Humanities
Paragraph 1
- Paragraph note
- Background on Teatro Campesino (1965, associated with Chávez's labor movement/grape boycott)
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Comparison, according to the author:
- 1965, the same year that Chávez gained recognition for organizing a grape boycott to get growers in California to sign union contracts, marked the birth of the Chicano theater movement with Valdez's formation of Teatro Campesino (second through last sentences)
- Author's attitude: "marks the birth" (third sentence); "generally credited" (last sentence); "reach its apex" (last sentence)
- Comparison, according to the author:
Paragraph 2
- Paragraph note
- Development of "actos" (sketches based on farm workers' experiences that satirize strikebreakers and inspire social action)
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Comparison, according to the author:
- Like the subjects of his "actos," Valdez was a former farm worker (second sentence)
- Definition of "actos": skits or sketches that expose problems, satirize the opposition, and inspire social action (fourth and sixth sentences)
- Author's attitude: "quintessential form" (fifth sentence); "any good political theater" (sixth sentence); "palpable immediacy" (last sentence)
- Comparison, according to the author:
Paragraph 3
- Paragraph note
- Author/Broyles-González's criticism of theater historians (Valdez contributed to but didn't invent actos, a collective accomplishment inspired by carpas)
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Theater historians's view:
- Valdez invented actos by himself (first sentence)
- Author/Broyles-González's view:
- Actos were a collective accomplishment (last sentence)
- Valdez contribution was crucial, however, as he brought carpas, European theater, and the collective together (last sentence)
- Comparisons, according to the author/Broyles-González:
- Actos were similar to and influenced by carpas, border area satires performed to working-class audiences at the turn of the 20th century (second through fourth sentences)
- Author's attitude: "rightly criticizes" (first sentence); "as if the striking farm workers' improvisational talent had depended entirely on his vision and expertise for the form it took" (first sentence); "flourished" (third sentence); "no doubt had substantial cultural links to this tradition and likely adapted it to their improvisations" (fourth sentence); "was, in fact, a collective accomplishment" (last sentence); "crucial one" (last sentence); "were neither carpas nor theater in the European tradition of Valdez's academic training, but a distinctive genre" (last sentence)
- Theater historians's view:
Main Point: While the Teatro Campesino was a collective effort influenced by earlier shows such as carpas, Valdez was a key figure in bringing that collective together and influencing the form that actos — a key element of the Teatro — took.
Meta-Structure?Correcting the Record: The Correcting the Record Meta-Structure best fits this passage.* In such a passage, the author typically starts by describing a common misconception or false belief. Often, this false belief is based on a lack of information. Then, the author explains why this past belief is false or misleading, occasionally offering an alternative belief. In this passage, we learn that some theater historians have credited Valdez with inventing actos as a genre. The author endorses Broyles-González's argument that actos and the Teatro Campesino were collective accomplishments that took influence from an earlier genre called carpas.
In a passage that uses a Correcting the Record Meta-Structure, the main point is often the author's explanation of why the misconception is false. However, if the author provides an alternative belief, the main point will be the author's opinion about that belief. Since this author provides a new belief on Valdez's role in the creation of actos, we made the crux of our anticipated main point.
*As is often the case with passages that use a Meta-Structure from the Critical family of major Meta-Structures, several other Critical Meta-Structures could also describe this passage. We could easily call this a Criticizing a Viewpoint or Rebutting Critics passage, even if the author's tone isn't especially negative toward the corrected view. We could even call this a Resolving a Debate passage since the author's conclusion ultimately finds the middle ground between the views held by the theater historians and Broyles-González. We could even call this an Innovative [Subject] passage since Valdez's actos could be considered an artistic "innovation."
Last Thoughts?The first two paragraphs include a lot of background information — with many dates, especially. We'll probably get some Minor Detail questions about those paragraphs, so let's be sure that we keep the timeline in mind as we work through the questions.
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: C
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Strategy Overview
Answer Anticipation
Answer choices
-
AIts efforts to organize Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
(A) Is this consistent with the main point or reflected in our notes?
Nope. Neither the main point nor our notes talk about what the Teatro Campesino accomplished, especially in terms of Chávez's labor movement. In fact, our notes suggest that the passage shifts gears from the discussion of the labor work halfway through the first paragraph. We can safely eliminate — or at least table — (A) without checking the passage.
Besides, we wouldn't find support for (A) even if we re-read the entire passage. There's no mention that any farm owners accepted the Teatro Campesino's unionization efforts.
-
BIt included among its Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
(B) Is this consistent with the main point or reflected in our notes?
No. Our note for the second paragraph says that members of the Teatro Campesino were "farm workers" who had recent "experiences" with the strikes. Maybe these members were products of the famous mime-to-farm-worker pipeline, but it doesn't seem very likely. We can safely eliminate — or at least table — (B) without checking the passage.
Besides, we wouldn't find support for (B) even if we re-read the entire passage. In the second paragraph, where the development of the Teatro Campesino and actos is discussed, only Valdez is said to have been a student of the San Francisco Mime Troupe (P2, S4).
-
CIt did not play Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C matches the stem
(C) Is this consistent with the main point or reflected in our notes?
Well, our note for the first paragraph says, "Background on Teatro Campesino (1965, associated with Chávez's labor movement/grape boycott)." That suggests that the Teatro Campesino came out in 1965. It doesn't say that it didn't play a role in the earliest efforts of Chávez's labor movement to gain international recognition. But this is a fairly easy-to-support statement. If we can find proof that Chávez's labor movement received recognition before 1965, we can prove that (C) is correct. If you can remember that Chávez's labor movement's successes preceded the Teatro Campesino's creation, you can check the passage to confirm that this is correct. If you can't, it's probably best practice to mark (C) as a possible contender but check the remaining answer choices to see if any are consistent with the main point or reflected in our notes.
Once we check the passage, we'll head to the first paragraph, where the historical context and dates are mentioned. There, we can see that Chávez had gained international recognition by 1965 (P1, S2). That's also the year that "marks the birth of contemporary Chicano theater," as Valdez approached Chávez about using theater to organize farm workers, eventually leading to the Teatro Campesino (P1, S3). Since the earliest unionization efforts must have started before 1965, and the Teatro Campesino eventually developed out of a meeting that was held that year, this answer must be true. We can select it and advance to the following question.
-
DAlthough its first performances Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
(D) Is this consistent with the main point or reflected in our notes?
Nope. Neither the main point nor our notes discuss which language the performances were in. So, we can safely eliminate — or at least table — (D) without checking the passage.
Besides, we wouldn't find support for (D) even if we re-read the entire passage. The passage never discusses language or non-Spanish-speaking audiences, so this answer is unsupported.
-
EIts work drew praise Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
(E) Is this consistent with the main point or reflected in our notes?
No. Neither the main point nor our notes bring up the critical response to the Teatro Campesino. So, we can safely eliminate — or at least table — (E) without checking the passage.
Besides, we wouldn't find support for (E) even if we re-read the entire passage. The passage talks about scholars of Mexican American history and theater historians (P3, S1), but we don't see anything specifically about critics. Even giving this answer the benefit of the doubt and saying that these individuals count as critics, there's no discussion of their nationality, so this answer is unsupported.
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
No threads yet—be the first to ask a question or share an approach.