Logical reasoning PrepTest 138 · Section 4 · Question 16
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: E
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Argument or Facts
Valid or Flawed
Question Type
Stimulus Summary
Answer Anticipation
Answer choices
-
AIf it had not Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
This is a common incorrect answer in Must be True questions. For the most part, we can’t infer what would have happened in a different world - any number of things could have happened differently! -
BIf academic standards had Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Similar to (A), we don’t know what would have happened in an alternative reality, so this answer is unsupported. -
COver the past 10 Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
This is one of the two trap answers that we anticipated. We know that the ratio of in- and out-of-province students changed, but without knowing that the overall student body stayed the same size, we can’t draw an inference about the sizes of each individual group. -
DOver the past 10 Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
There’s no discussion of any other college in Markland, nor is there any superlative language used that would let us compare Central Markland with others despite not specifically mentioning them, so this answer is unsupported. -
EIf the college's per Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E matches the stem
First, note that this answer doesn’t change something we know happened as (A) and (B) did - it instead puts a qualification on which the answer is conditioned. Second, it doesn’t make the mistake of (C) in talking about the student body size since it talks about per capita revenue, not overall revenue. With that noted, we should fully consider this answer. We know that the student ratio has skewed away from the higher-paying out-of-province students to the lower-paying in-province students. If, however, the average (“per capita”) tuition has remained the same while this shift to the lower-paying students has happened, it must be the case that tuition has, overall, gone up. If not, the shift to the lower-paying students should have resulted in lower per capita revenue from tuition. This answer is therefore supported by the stimulus and is correct.
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
No threads yet—be the first to ask a question or share an approach.