Logical reasoning PrepTest 138 · Section 3 · Question 13
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: E
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Answer choices
-
ADuring the 800–year period Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Incorrect. The impact of hunting on the seal population can be inferred, but that's not directly tied to hunting practices not varying, so this answer is out of scope. -
BThe body size of Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. There's no discussion of health, so this answer is out of scope. -
CBefore the 800–year period Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. There's no information about what happened before the time period, so this answer is out of scope. -
DNative peoples in North Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. While hunting is mentioned in the stimulus, there's no discussion of Nativve peoples limiting their hunting to preserve seal populations. While it is inferrable that the seal population size was stable, there's no indication that that result was intentional. -
EHunting by Native peoples Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Facts
Question Type:
Must Be True
Stimulus Summary:
Relationship - The smaller the average seal size, the larger the population
Archaeologists - The average seal size didn't change in North America during an 800-years period
Answer Anticipation:
If the average seal size is a reliable indicator of the population size, and the average seal size didn't change in a certain location over a period of time, then we can infer that the population didn't change much during that time period. Since it connects that period to seal hunting, there's a good chance the correct answer will, too—possibly by saying that the hunting wasn't at a high enough level to impact population size.
Answer Explanation:
Since body size is a reliable indicator of population, and body size didn't change, we can infer that population size was stable. Since hunting happened while population size was stable, we can infer that hunting didn't significantly reduce the population size.
Key Takeaway:
This stimulus featured a relationship that was established, and then it was applied to a specific case. When a relationship like this one is established—a directly or inversely proportional relationship, or an equivalence between two measurements—expect its application in a given case by bringing up one element of the relationship, allowing an inference to be made about the other element.
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
-
Why is C correct? Why is A incorrect? 3 replies
Started by Ryan-Mahabir
-
Answer Explanation 3 replies
Started by Julie-V