Logical reasoning PrepTest 132 · Section 4 · Question 26
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: D
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Answer choices
-
ADoctors are less likely Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Incorrect. This answer highlights a relevant difference between the age groups. If doctors are more likely to catch malnutrition in younger patients, that would explain why the percentages skew in the way they do. -
BPeople over 65 are Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. Another relevant difference—the older group takes a medicine increasing their nutritional needs, thus making it more likely they'll fail to meet them and be malnourished. -
CPeople over 65 are Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. Loss of appetite could lead to malnutrition, so this answer brings up a relevant difference and thus explains the data. -
DPeople 65 or younger Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Facts
Question Type:
Bizarro Paradox
Stimulus Summary:
65+ – 25% malnourished, but 12% below poverty line
65 and under – A greater percentage fell below the poverty line than were malnourished
Answer Anticipation:
This question features data about two age groups, and the relationship between poverty and malnourishment. Based on the way the Sociologist discusses the data for the group 65 and under, the important piece of data here isn't the specific numbers, but rather the relationship between them. For those over 65, a higher percentage were malnourished than were poor. For those 65 and under, that's reversed.
So to explain this data, we should look for a relevant difference between these two groups that could explain why that relationship is inverted. There will be at least 4 explanations, so we should spend less time anticipating a variety of possible answers and more analyzing the answers through what we just defined they have to do.
Answer Explanation:
Unlike all the other answer choices, this one brings up a similarity, and thus it doesn't explain why the nutrition falls on different sides of the poverty line for these two age groups.
Key Takeaway:
In Paradox questions, when attempting to explain a difference, relevant differences tend to be correct answers. In fact, across question types, if an argument deals with comparisons, then the correct answer will likely bring up an additional relevant point of comparison. -
EPeople 65 or younger Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Incorrect. Another answer that brings up a relevant difference—if digestion is more likely to be negatively affected in those over 65, then that group would be more susceptible to malnutrition.
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
-
Question 3 replies
Started by Steph