Reading comp PrepTest 132 · Section 1 · Question 20
Passage
Passage walkthrough
Topic: Science
Passage A
Paragraph 1
- Paragraph note
- Factors in decay; connection; what it can show
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, points of intersection, and the author's attitude
- Connection - Dental caries (decay) and sticky carbs
- Show - When humans went from hunting to agriculture
- Factors in decay (don’t try to memorize)
Paragraph 2
- Paragraph note
- Research and examples of connection
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, points of intersection, and the author's attitude
- Conclusion - Carbs are linked to caries
- Leigh - Sioux (meat, no caries) and Zuni (carbs/agriculture, caries)
- Others confirm
Paragraph 3
- Paragraph note
- Exceptions (examples)
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, points of intersection, and the author's attitude
- Exceptions - Nonagricultural groups who had caries - at more cariogenic carbs
- Examples - Western North America (stone-ground acorns); Hopi (pinyon nuts and tubers)
Passage B
Paragraph 1
- Paragraph note
- Background
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, points of intersection, and the author's attitude
- Ban Chiang skeletons found - 2000 year period from hunter to agriculture
Paragraph 2
- Paragraph note
- A trend is noted and explained
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, points of intersection, and the author's attitude
- Trend - More agriculture = declining health (including caries)
- Why? More sticky carbs
- Why? Less tooth wear (fiber/grit) that removes fissures in carb diet
- (Exception - Too much wear causes caries)
Paragraph 3
- Paragraph note
- Expectation in example from Paragraph 1
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, points of intersection, and the author's attitude
- Ban Chiang - Ate carbs throughout 2000 year period
- Expectation - Carbs should have led to caries
Paragraph 4
- Paragraph note
- A paradox is introduced; potential resolutions noted
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, points of intersection, and the author's attitude
- Paradox - More frequent caries in early group despite increasing agriculture
- Ruled out explanation - Changes in tooth wear (no changes seen)
- Potential explanation - Diet remained varied and switched to less bad carbs
Main Points:
Passage A - While there are some exceptions, a shift to agriculture and consumption of “sticky” carbs increases the frequency of dental caries in a population.
Passage B - Remains found at Ban Chiang present a paradoxical case where increased reliance on agriculture resulted in fewer dental caries - contrary to expectations - which may be explained by their overall diet and switch from certain carbs to others.
Key Lines?Passage A:
- Lines 1-3 - A relationship is established
- Lines 3-5 Using one thing as a proxy for another is discussed
- Line 6 - A list of factors is introduced
- Line 12 - A list of examples/research is started
- Lines 23-25 - An exception is noted
- Line 25 - More examples are started
Passage B:
- Lines 39-41 - A relationship is established
- Lines 42-44 - Two potential explanations are established
- Line 57 - A paradox is previewed (“should theoretically”)
- Lines 58-60 - The paradox is stated
- Lines 61-62 - One explanation from earlier is ruled out
- Lines 63-69 - Potential explanations are presented
Meta-Structure? Relationship Between Passages?
Generalization/Example (Passage A) - Passage A presents several generalizations that it follows up with examples. This happens in both Paragraphs 2 and 3.
Exception (Passage A) - After discussing a general rule throughout the first two paragraphs, the Author shifts to discussing a class of exceptions to that rule.
Overarching Example (Passage B) - Unlike Passage A, Passage B focuses on a single example - that of the skeletal remains found in Ban Chiang.
Paradox/Resolution (Passage B) - Passage B introduces a paradox (“Yet”). According to expectations, as the Ban Chiang population relied more on agriculture, they should have seen more caries. Evidence says that the frequency of caries went down. The passage then rules out one explanation before presenting alternatives as possibilities (“more likely that”).
The two passages both deal with the same topic - the relationship between an increased reliance on agriculture and the frequency of dental caries/tooth decay. And both are largely aligned in that they treat it as a general rule that more agriculture results in more tooth decay (Lines 11-12; Lines 39-41). And neither concludes that this is wrong - instead, they both present exceptions. In the case of Passage A, the Author explicitly mentions exceptions (Paragraph 3). In Passage B, the Author explores an exceptional case (Line 57; Lines 58-60) and presents potential reasons that this case doesn’t conform to the norm (varied diet; switch to less cariogenic carbs).
Last Thoughts?These passages have a lot of overlap between them, so we should expect more questions about similarities than differences.
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: C
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Strategy Overview
Answer Anticipation
Answer choices
-
AVarieties that are cultivated Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
(A) (Lines 13-18; Lines 26-29; Lines 51-53) Passage A compares cultivated maize to meat, and it discusses the high caries rate of wild (“gathered”) acorns that have been processed, but it doesn’t compare cultivated to wild varieties of carb-heavy foods. Passage B discusses only cultivated rice and yams. This answer, thus, features an unsupported comparison.
-
BThose that require substantial Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
(B) (Lines 26-29; Lines 34-36) Passage A brings up a nonagricultural society that at “highly processed” stone-ground acorn flour. Passage B mentions the early Ban Chiang population had a hunter-gatherer-cultivator economy, but it doesn’t go enough into their diet to know if they skipped over highly processed carbs. As such, neither passage supports this answer.
-
CSome of them naturally Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C matches the stem
(C) (Lines 25-31; Lines 66-69) Passage A mentions that highly processed stone-ground acorn flower resulted in high caries frequency, and several wild plants collected by the Hopi showed “high cariogenic potential,” suggesting that there’s variability to the cariogenic potential. Passage B notes that rice is a “less cariogenic carbohydrate” than yams. Both feature comparative language when discussing how cariogenic certain carbs are, supporting this answer.
-
DSome of them reduce Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
(D) (Lines 44-50) While fiber does wear down teeth and prevent caries, Passage B doesn’t connect carb-rich foods to fiber - in fact, it notes as a shift is made to an agricultural diet (which is generally heavier in carbs - think of that delicious wheat) there’s less fiber in the diet. Passage A also doesn’t mention this at all.
-
EThe cariogenic potential of Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
(E) (Lines 16-18; Line 28; Line 29; Lines 51-53) Passage A talks about cultivated maize, but it never talks about wild maize. And it talks about gathered acorns and wild plants, but never cultivated versions of them. Passage B talks about cultivated yams and rice, but never wild yams and rice. This answer is unsupported in either passage.
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
No threads yet—be the first to ask a question or share an approach.