Logical reasoning PrepTest 127 · Section 2 · Question 6

Question prompt

Dietitian: High consumption of Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: E

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Strengthen with Necessary Premise Questions

Answer choices

  1. A
    Fresh fruits and vegetables Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited
    Incorrect. The relevant comparison is between potassium levels in fresh vs. frozen/canned fruits/veggies.
  2. B
    Food processing businesses often Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited
    Incorrect. There doesn't need to be more sodium in these fruits/veggies for the argument to work, just less potassium.
  3. C
    Potassium is the only Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited
    Incorrect. Even if other minerals protect against sodium, they may be significantly rarer or harder to get into the diet than potassium, and thus the recommendation could still hold.
  4. D
    Potassium in fruits and Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited
    Incorrect. The argument is only about maintaining cardiac health, so if fresh fruits/vegetables have side effects unrelated to heart health, the argument can still work. This answer is out of scope in bringing up other health issues that could stem from eating fresh fruits/veggies.
  5. E
    Fresh fruits and vegetables Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E matches the stem
    Correct. Argument or Facts:
    Argument

    Valid or Flawed:
    Flawed

    Question Type:
    Strengthen with Necessary Premise

    Stimulus Summary:
    Sodium causes heart disease. Potassium counteracts these effects.
    Goal: Protect heart while eating sodium
    Method: Avoid canned/frozen fruits/veggies and eat fresh ones.

    Answer Anticipation:
    This argument establishes a few causal relationships. First, sodium causes heart disease. Second, potassium protects the heart from sodium. The Dietitian then establishes an interesting goal—not just to protect the heart, but also to keep eating sodium. In order to accomplish that, based on the premises, one should eat potassium. However, instead of concluding that, the Dietitian starts talking about eating fresh fruits/veggies rather than frozen/canned fruit/veggies. For that recommendation to make sense, there must be more potassium in fresh fruit/veggies compared to the frozen/canned alternatives.

    Answer Explanation:
    This answer draws the connection that justifies the Dietitian's recommendation. If fresh fruits/veggies don't have more potassium than canned/frozen alternatives, then there's no reason to recommend that shift for people who want to protect their heart from sodium.

    Key Takeaway:
    Goal/recommendation arguments are strongly related to causal arguments, as a means for achieving a goal is necessarily going to rely on a cause/effect relationship. Framing questions through this lens can make it a lot easier to handle these concepts and see where the gap in the logic is!

What this tests

Question analytics

Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.

Answer choice distribution

  1. A 7%
  2. B 7%
  3. C 6%
  4. D 2%
  5. E Credited 78%

Deeper help

Ask follow-ups on any step

Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.

Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.

Discussion