Logical reasoning PrepTest 127 · Section 1 · Question 20

Question prompt

A recent study suggests Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: A

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Argument or Facts

Argument

Valid or Flawed

Flawed

Question Type

Errors in Reasoning Questions

Stimulus Summary

Study New - Drinking 3 glasses of wine per day cuts your risk of stroke

Answer Anticipation

There are two studies and two conclusions here that interact in an interesting way in that the critics - the second viewpoint/conclusion - doesn’t really contradict the first one.
In that first study/conclusion, it’s stated that drinking 3 glasses of wine per day decreases risk of stroke. There’s no claim that drinking that much wine is healthy - just that it decreases stroke risk.
The Critics accept that as true. However, they do go on to bring up another study showing that binge drinking - drinking 3 or more glasses of one once per week - is bad for your heart. They then compare the results from these two studies and determine that it’s at least a wash, and drinking 3 glasses of wine each day doesn’t benefit overall health. After all, the increased risk of heart attack balances out the decreased risk of stroke, right?
Well, it would if the studies looked at the same behavior. However, the groups analyzed in the studies are different, and the study relied on by the Critics isn’t about the same group/behavior in their conclusion. That first study has a group that matches with the conclusion - those who drink 3 glasses of wine each day. However, the study cited by the Critics about heart attack risk brings up binge drinkers - those who drink only once per week (or less) but have 3 or more glasses of wine when they do drink.
While “3 glasses of wine” ties these two groups together, they’re different in two fundamental ways. First, the former group drinks every day instead of at most once a week, and second, the latter group drinks 3 “or more” drinks when they drink, not exactly three glasses. In conflating these groups - or, at least, the applicability of the results in the study - the Critics make a flawed argument, so we should look for an answer pointing that out.

Answer choices

  1. A
    inappropriately attributes the consequences Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A matches the stem
    This answer notes the shift in groups and the Critics’ flawed application of the results of a study about one group to what is true of the other. Binge drinkers suffer an increased risk of heart attack; it’s possible that non-binge drinkers who have 3 glasses of wine each day don’t have the same elevated risk of heart attack. If that’s the case, then the only change that’s certain for that group is decreased risk of stroke, thus arguing for a health benefit to drinking that much wine.
  2. B
    confuses the risk of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited
    While the argument reaches a conclusion about overall health based on looking only at risk of stroke and heart attack, the argument isn’t confusing other health risks with the risk of sudden heart attack. If anything, it’s ignoring these other health risks.
  3. C
    presumes, without providing justification, Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited
    The conclusion is about wine drinkers, and the binge drinking study is tied to wine drinkers, so there’s no shift between other types of alcohol and wine.
  4. D
    fails to address specifically Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited
    The specific decrease in risk isn’t something that needs to be established - it only needs to be established that that risk is comparable to the increased risk of heart attack. As such, this isn’t a flaw in the argument.
  5. E
    overlooks the difference between Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited
    The argument is about health, not longevity. While the two are related, they’re distinct concepts. Additionally, there’s no discussion of fatal vs. non-fatal heart attacks.

What this tests

Question analytics

Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.

Answer choice distribution

  1. A Credited 66%
  2. B 8%
  3. C 9%
  4. D 15%
  5. E 3%

Deeper help

Ask follow-ups on any step

Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.

Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.

Discussion

  • Answer choice D 1 reply

    Started by AndrewArabie

  • Answer A 1 reply

    Started by yckim2180

  • Explanation 1 reply

    Started by Advaith