Reading comp PrepTest 123 · Section 4 · Question 26
Passage
Passage walkthrough
- Paragraph note
- A problem with studying a certain history is noted
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Irish landscape - Historians rely on documents
- Problem - Fragmentary, unreliable, and generally limited to military/commerce
Paragraph 2
- Paragraph note
- A partial solution
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Partial solution - Study fossilized pollen grains
- Shows changes in vegetation (human and natural causes)
- What plants grew when
- Supplement/Correct documentary record (partial)
Paragraph 3
- Paragraph note
- Example of pollen analysis
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Pollen analysis - Cereal grains grown in LL/CD ~400 AD
- Prior belief - Cereal grains not grown here (clay) until moldboard plough (7th c)
- New belief - Cereal grains grown before that invention
Paragraph 4
- Paragraph note
- Example 2
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- LL linen
- Prior belief - Flax (linen plant) was grown before 18th c
- New belief - Flax pollen only since 18th c, so not grown before
Paragraph 5
- Paragraph note
- Limits and example
- Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
- Limits exist
- Example - Can ID genus/family, but not species for some
- Example of Example - Madder - can’t tell if cultivated or wild based on pollen
Studying fossilized pollen grains can supplement and correct the history of the Irish landscape that is derived from documents (even if it has limitations).
Key Lines?
Lines 3-5 - A problem is highlighted
Lines 10-12 - A partial solution is noted (partial because it’s an “additional means” aside from the incomplete one already noted)
Lines 18-20 - The Author shows how her solution works with the current process
Lines 48-50 - The Author places limitations on her solution
Meta-Structure?
Problem/Solution - This passage presents a problem in Paragraph 1 - the documentary evidence on a topic of interest (the Irish landscape’s history) is incomplete. The Author then presents a solution to that problem - fossilized pollen grains can be used to supplement and correct this record (Lines 10-12; Lines 19-20). However, there are limitations to this solution (Lines 48-50), so it’s a partial solution. When a passage is defined by a Problem/Solution Meta-Structure, the Author’s solution is the main point, reflected in what we wrote above.
Examples - The passage uses several examples to make its point. Paragraph 3 includes an example to show pollen records correcting a prior belief; Paragraph 4 had a separate example for the same purpose. And Paragraph 5 included an example that highlighted a limitation on the method. None of these examples are central, so they’re more likely to show up in questions about specifics rather than in big-picture questions.
Last Thoughts?
Those examples carried a lot of weight in the passage, so we should expect some questions focused on them. It’ll also be important to remember that the Author brought up limitations on her process for analyzing the history of the Irish landscape, so we should be sure that any answer we select that reflects her view is more balanced.
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: E
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Strategy Overview
Answer Anticipation
Answer choices
-
AThe Irish landscape had Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Incorrect. Flooding? That wasn't mentioned in the passage. -
BCereal grain was not Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. (Lines 26—29) This is related to the first example, from Paragraph 3, but it could still be right. However, the view stated there is that "these soils," referring to the clay soils of Long Lough in County Down, weren't tilled and thus didn't grow cereal until the 7th century. Their view is limited to parts of Ireland which have similar soil — and that might not be all of it. -
CThe history of the Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. The Author does establish that the documentary record which historians worked from is fragmentary, but there's no indication that they weren't aware of it! They could have been working with what they had while lamenting its shortcomings, just waiting for an enterprising historian to invent pollen analysis. -
DMadder was not used Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. (Lines 52—58) Madder is the example from Paragraph 5, and there's no prior belief of historians there to be overturned. -
EThe beginning of flax Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E matches the stem
Correct. (Lines 42—44) This view is stated directly in Paragraph 4 as being held by historians until the pollen record corrected it, so this is the correct answer.
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
-
Answer Correlations 1 reply
Started by zah3