Reading comp PrepTest 123 · Section 1 · Question 18

Passage

Questions 14-20 The following passage was written in the mid–1990s.  .        The demand for electricity in certain countries has Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary

Topic: Science


Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph note
    • Problem, solution, and problem with solution
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Problem, according to the author:
      • The demand for electricity from fossil fuels in certain countries going up drastically, hurting the environment and human health
    • Comparison of problem and solution, according to the author:
      • Unlike fossil fuels, renewable energy sources are available everywhere and do not pollute the environment
    • Examples of renewable energy solutions, according to the author:
      • Solar radiation, wind, and water power
    • Problem with the solution, according to the author:
      • The technologies for this aren’t always rolled out in a way that leads to long-term success
    • Author’s attitude: “Unfortunately” (line 3); “possible solutions” (line 11); “not always implemented successfully” (lines 20-21)

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph note
    • Unsuccessful example of solution
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Example of a renewable-energy project not implemented successfully, according to the author:
      • The U.S. helped Brazil install solar panels in 1992
      • The project failed because Brazil didn’t develop local production capabilities for the solar panels, so only earned enough to break even and failed to get more investment
    • Author’s attitude: “missed an opportunity” (line 35); “precluded the long-term benefits” (line 37); “makes further investment and expansion unlikely” (lines 43-44); “remains stalled” (line 45)

Paragraph 3

  • Paragraph note
    • Successful example of solution
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Example of a renewable-energy project that was implemented successfully, according to the author:
      • Denmark helps India build wind turbines in the 1980s
      • Succeeded because Denmark encouraged local involvement, allowing for snowballing profitability
    • Comparison between successful and unsuccessful examples, according to the author:
      • Unlike the U.S., Denmark encouraged local involvement at all levels
    • Author’s attitude: “avoided these pitfalls” (line 46); “success” (line 55); “importance of local involvement” (line 59-60); “good chance of remaining competitive and profitable for the long run” (lines 61-62)

Main Point: Using renewable energy sources is a potential way to address growing energy needs in certain countries, but there are pitfalls that need to be avoided by ensuring local involvement in all stages of the project.

Key Lines?

Lines 3-5 - Problem

Lines 9-12 - A possible solution

Lines 19-21 - Problem/limitation of the solution

Line 22 - An example of the solution failing introduced

Line 46 - An example of the solution working introduced

Meta-Structure?

Problem/Solution: This passage explicitly falls into the Problem/Solution Meta-Structure, with the author highlighting “possible solutions to the problems” of increased energy demands in Lines 11-12. When this Meta-Structure is present, the author’s proposed solution — or the author’s opinion of the central solution — constitutes the main point.

Interestingly here, the author brings up a possible solution but highlights a problem with it. The author notes that, while renewable energy could solve the energy demand problem, the long-term implementation of renewable energy projects isn’t always done successfully (Lines 19-21). The author then goes on to use two examples to illustrate how the implementation of such projects can go right and wrong. These examples illustrate the key difference that can explain the different outcomes — the involvement of local communities at all levels (Lines 58-62). Since the author describes the problem with the solution and how to address that problem, that should also be reflected in the main point.

Examples: This passage relies heavily on the discussion of two examples, each of which takes up an entire paragraph. In Paragraph 2, the author offers an example of renewable energy being implemented unsuccessfully, explaining that this happened because short-term savings were prioritized over developing the local production capacity for solar energy (Lines 36-40). In Paragraph 3, the author shows an example of renewable energy being implemented successfully. Unlike the first example, this renewable energy project featured local involvement at all stages of the implementation (Lines 58-62). Since these examples are both very involved and key to demonstrating the author’s main point, they’re likely to feature heavily in the questions.

Last Thoughts?

Being sure to keep the elements of the two examples separate in our minds will be key to finding relevant information quickly, so be sure that you do so. Or, if you have trouble remembering these kinds of details, try writing down key elements of each so that you can quickly identify which example a question or answer is talking about!

Question prompt

In the passage, the Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: B

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Science

Strategy Overview

Review the Main Point and key Meta-Structures, then find an answer reflecting these elements

Answer Anticipation

As we noted after reading the passage, it explicitly falls into the Problem/Solution Meta-Structure, with the author raising “possible solutions to the problems” of increasing energy demands in a world that relies on fossil fuels (Lines 9-12).However, it had a twist on that common Meta-Structure - the author raised a problem with the solution. Namely, the author says that projects to implement renewable energy solutions are “not always implemented successfully” (Lines 19-21).From there, the author dives into two examples — one successful, one unsuccessful — before concluding the key difference between the two (Lines 58-62). According to the author, in order to be successful and profitable over the long run, a renewable energy project should “recognize[] the importance of local involvement at all levels.”So, in this passage, the author is primarily interested in putting forward a solution to a problem and explaining what factors will determine whether the solution will be successfully implemented. Let’s find an answer reflecting that purpose.

Answer choices

  1. A
    summarizing the reasons why Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited

    (A) Does this answer say the author is primarily concerned with putting forward a solution to a problem and explaining what factors will determine whether the solution will be successfully implemented?

    Not quite. The author does argue why renewable energy should be used. However, the author doesn’t explain why certain technologies can’t be implemented profitably. Rather, the author highlights a key factor in whether a given renewable energy project will be successful — local involvement. The author puts forward a solar project that failed but never indicates that it was destined to fail because of the technology used.

  2. B
    arguing for the advantages Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B matches the stem

    (B) Does this answer say the author is primarily concerned with putting forward a solution to a problem and explaining what factors will determine whether the solution will be successfully implemented?

    Yes! The author puts renewable energies forward as a possible solution to the problems associated with increased energy demands, so a primary purpose of the passage is to argue for the advantages of renewable energy resources. The author also uses two key examples to illustrate the point that these technologies are “not always implemented successfully” and highlights key factors in this successful implementation — local involvement at all levels. This answer reflects the Problem/Solution Meta-Structure, as well as the author’s focus on factors that will play into whether the solution will work, so this is the correct answer.

  3. C
    illustrating the advantages of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited

    (C) Does this answer say the author is primarily concerned with putting forward a solution to a problem and explaining what factors will determine whether the solution will be successfully implemented?

    Not quite. This answer choice omits any references to the limitations to successfully implementing renewable energy projects — a major red flag. After all, the examples in Paragraphs 2 and 3 illustrate how the implementation of the technologies isn’t always successful — not the advantages of adopting renewable energy sources. So this answer is incorrect.

  4. D
    comparing and contrasting two Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited

    (D) Does this answer say the author is primarily concerned with putting forward a solution to a problem and explaining what factors will determine whether the solution will be successfully implemented?

    Nope. While the Brazilian project featured solar technology while the Indian one featured wind turbines, the key difference was local involvement at all levels, not the underlying technologies used. As such, comparing and contrasting the technologies wasn’t a key priority of the passage.

  5. E
    discussing two types of Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited

    (E) Does this answer say the author is primarily concerned with putting forward a solution to a problem and explaining what factors will determine whether the solution will be successfully implemented?

    1. This has the same problem as (B). The author doesn’t compare two renewable energy resources, just two projects that used different resources. The key difference the author identifies is unrelated to the underlying resources — it’s local involvement in the project. So this answer is incorrect.

What this tests

Question analytics

Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.

Answer choice distribution

  1. A 9%
  2. B Credited 81%
  3. C 5%
  4. D 3%
  5. E 3%

Deeper help

Ask follow-ups on any step

Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.

Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.

Discussion