Logical reasoning PrepTest 122 · Section 2 · Question 10

Question prompt

Megan: People pursue wealth Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: E

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Point at Issue Questions

Answer choices

  1. A
    people ever pursue wealth Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A is not credited
    Incorrect. Both speakers agree that some people do pursue such wealth, they just disagree over what motivates it.
  2. B
    it is irrational to Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited
    Incorrect. Neither speaker discusses the rationality of any actions, so this answer is out of scope.
  3. C
    the pursuit of monetary Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited
    Incorrect. Similar to (B), there's no discussion of rationality, so this answer is out of scope.
  4. D
    it is rational to Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited
    Incorrect. Yet another answer about rationality! We can throw this out because, again, neither speaker discusses whether these actions are rational.
  5. E
    the motive for pursuing Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E matches the stem
    Correct. Argument or Facts:
    Facts/Argument

    Valid or Flawed:
    NA/Flawed

    Question Type:
    Point at Issue

    Stimulus Summary:
    M: Pursue wealth beyond needs → See it as a way to achieve status/prestige

    C: Money can be exchanged for goods and services that you need/want, regardless of prestige, so not everyone agrees with your statement.

    Answer Anticipation:
    Megan and Channen both bring up a common concept that matters in LSAT questions—motive.

    They both agree that people pursue money beyond what they need. Megan believes this is to gain status and prestige, whereas Channen thinks that at least some people are motivated by material goods and are indifferent to how others see them. Since motive is such a common relevant element in LSAT questions, and the two speakers here disagree over the motives behind a certain action, it's likely that this will show up in the correct answer.

    Answer Explanation:
    This answer speaks to the different motives identified by the two speakers. Megan believes that pursuing extra wealth is done "only if" people think it will get them status or prestige, which commits her to believing that the motive isn't ever anything else. Channen believes that "not everyone" is so motivated, with some pursuing more money to get goods that they want. He believes, then, that the motive is sometimes something other than these two things. This is therefore the point at issue between them.

    Key Takeaway:
    Motive is a common relevant aspect of arguments where it's mentioned. When you see an argument discuss motive, pay attention to how it factors in, as that will likely be relevant to the correct answer.

What this tests

Question analytics

Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.

Answer choice distribution

  1. A 5%
  2. B 1%
  3. C 2%
  4. D 2%
  5. E Credited 90%

Deeper help

Ask follow-ups on any step

Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.

Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.

Discussion