Logical reasoning PrepTest 120 · Section 3 · Question 2

Question prompt

Being near woodlands, the Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: A

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Strengthen Questions

Answer choices

  1. A
    The likelihood that a Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A matches the stem
    Correct. Argument or Facts:
    Argument

    Valid or Flawed:
    Flawed

    Question Type:
    Strengthen

    Stimulus Summary:
    Bees (pollinators) visit flowers close by woods much more than those far away, so putting crops near woods is good for crops that pollinate.

    Answer Anticipation:
    The conclusion of this argument is that pollinating crops benefit from being near woods. Why? Because bees—top pollinators—visit flowers near woods more frequently than they visit other flowers.

    While pollination is a good thing for these plants, it's unclear if the number of times the bees visit them is related to a benefit. Maybe the first time a bee visits a flower, there's a benefit—but there isn't each subsequent time. Or maybe there's even a downside to being visited too frequently, such as the crop's energy ends up all being spent on making pollen instead of on growing.

    Since the argument assumes that more visits are better, the correct answer should provide some support for that.

    Answer Explanation:
    This answer directly connects the number of visits to a benefit. If the chances of being pollinated increases with more visits, then being in an area that guarantees more visits from bees would be a good thing, strengthening the argument.

    Key Takeaway:
    Sometimes, the assumption of an argument is hiding in plain sight. Here, it'd be easier to overlook the assumption—that more visits is better. When that happens, start by identifying new concepts in the conclusion and tie them to the ideas from the premises. Even if it sounds like you're not identifying a gap, it can still help you find the correct answer.
  2. B
    Many bees live in Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited
    Incorrect. First, the stimulus notes that woods are the natural habitat of bees, so presumably more live there than in these other locations. Outside of that, it can be beneficial for crops to be near woods and also good for them to be near other types of areas that also have a lot of bees. Since the argument doesn't say that woodlands are the best place for crops, or the only place where bees pollinate them, this answer is incorrect.
  3. C
    Woodlands are not the Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited
    Incorrect. But they are the natural habitat of bees—the most common pollinator—and so crops in the area can still benefit from the presence of this pollinator.
  4. D
    Some pollinators visit flowers Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited
    Incorrect. This isn't true of bees, though, so it's out of scope.
  5. E
    Many crops that are Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited
    Incorrect. The argument concludes that they may be missing out on a benefit by being planted there, but this answer does nothing to support that view.

What this tests

Question analytics

Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.

Answer choice distribution

  1. A Credited 85%
  2. B 3%
  3. C 3%
  4. D 4%
  5. E 6%

Deeper help

Ask follow-ups on any step

Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.

Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.

Discussion