Logical reasoning PrepTest 118 · Section 1 · Question 16
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: B
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Answer choices
-
AIndividuals have no rights Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Incorrect. This answer reflects a corollary belief that the author uses to highlight the absurdity of an underlying belief, so it's a premise of the argument. -
BWhat government officials and Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Argument
Valid or Flawed:
Flawed
Question Type:
Main Point
Stimulus Summary:
Believing the government's view towards rights is correct is the same as believing that people have no moral rights, so the government's views towards rights may be wrong.
Answer Anticipation:
"But that does not mean" is a common phrase used to introduce a conclusion since it's casting an opinion on an opposing point. Here, the rest of the argument supports that as the conclusion by showing that it leads to a belief that the author clearly views as wrong—that people have no moral rights. This is a form of a reductio ad absurdum argument, a common method of reasoning on the LSAT, and so we can feel confident that the pivot statement is the main point of the argument.
Answer Explanation:
This answer reflects the author's main point. The argument pivots to this opinion, that is then supported by showing how a belief that they are correct would lead to an absurd conclusion.
Key Takeaway:
Pivots are often to main points, especially when those pivots are judgments about an opposing point. Additionally, knowing common methods of reasoning—here, the reductio ad absurdum—can help understand the structure of an argument that falls into that method quickly, allowing you to find the conclusion with minimal work. -
CIndividuals have rights unless Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. This answer is an assumption of the argument, leading to the implication that believing people have no moral rights is absurd. It's not directly stated in the argument, and in a Main Point question, that's usually (but not always) a good sign that it's wrong. -
DThe police always agree Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. This answer is never stated in the argument. While it does say the police will carry out the directives of officials and courts, it doesn't say they agree with them. -
EOne should always try Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Incorrect. There's no statement in this vein in the stimulus, so it's incorrect.
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
-
Started by monicanimm
-
Identifying Conclusion 1 reply
Started by mahosmar
-
Left with A & D 1 reply
Started by Meredith