Logical reasoning PrepTest 111 · Section 4 · Question 7
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: C
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Answer choices
-
Aaggressive behavior is not Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Incorrect. The argument reasons that a violent person committed this crime, not that someone who committed the crime is therefore a violent person. This answer is a bit of a reversal of the stimulus. -
BSmith's testimony is unreliable Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. The stimulus doesn't bring up any of Smith's testimony (just what he didn't address), so this answer is out of scope. -
Csince Smith never disproved Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Argument
Valid or Flawed:
Flawed
Question Type:
Errors in Reasoning
Stimulus Summary:
Attorney: You should find Mr. Smith guilty because:
(1) He's violent
(2) The victim claims he threatened her loudly
(3) He didn't rebut that claim
Answer Anticipation:
The Attorney establishes a claim made by Ms. Lopez in her testimony, and whenever an argument relies on what someone says (or thinks, or believes), there's always the chance that they're lying (or wrong). Here, the only evidence provided that Mr. Smith did loudly threaten Ms. Lopez other than her testimony is his failure to refute this testimony.
But failure to disprove a claim doesn't provide evidence in favor of that claim—that's an absence of evidence flaw! Just because Mr. Smith didn't refute Ms. Lopez's claims that he loudly threatened her doesn't mean that he did or that he's admitting to it. Let's find an answer describing this absence of evidence flaw.
Answer Explanation:
The argument relies on the lack of a rebuttal to accept Ms. Lopez's claims. However, that's an absence of evidence flaw—the only reason her claims are accepted is because they weren't shown to be false. This answer reflects the error in reasoning in the stimulus, so this is the correct answer.
Key Takeaway:
When an argument relies on a lack of evidence against a claim to support that claim, it's committing an absence of evidence flaw. -
DLopez's testimony is reliable Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. The argument doesn't establish any characteristics of Ms. Lopez, so this answer is out of scope. -
Ehaving a violent character Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Incorrect. The Attorney believes that the violent Mr. Smith committed this violent crime, so this answer doesn't reflect the argument.
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
-
How is the answer, D? 2 replies
Started by Andrew
-
Explanation 2 replies
Started by devon
-
question 1 reply
Started by medasmx@protonmail.com