Logical reasoning PrepTest 111 · Section 1 · Question 5
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: E
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Question Type
Answer choices
-
Aisolating an ambiguity in Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
Incorrect. The Opponent doesn't point out any word that's used in an ambiguous or contradictory manner, so this answer is incorrect. -
Bshowing that claims made Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Incorrect. While the Opponent points out new considerations that undermine the Proponent's conclusion, she doesn't highlight how her statements themselves contradict that conclusion—it's only the new information that does. -
Cestablishing that undesirable consequences Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
Incorrect. The only alternative offered to irradiation with gamma rays is the chemical dip, but there are no downsides noted to using that method (it's "safe"). -
Dshifting perspective from safety Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
Incorrect. The Opponent discusses safety issues that would face consumers—botulism, in particular. -
Epointing out an alternative Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E matches the stem
Correct. Argument or Facts:
Argument/Argument
Valid or Flawed:
Flawed/Flawed
Question Type:
Methods of Reasoning
Stimulus Summary:
P: Irradiation with gamma rays:
(1) Leaves no radiation behind
(2) Kills Salmonella
(3) Removes the same amount of vitamins as cooking
(4) Stops food from spoiling
So there's no nutrition/safety reason to reject it.
O: It doesn't kill botulism but makes it harder for people to detect it, and there's an alternative that kills Salmonella and botulism.
Answer Anticipation:
We're tasked with describing how the Opponent's argument functions. She rebuts the claims made by the Proponent by bringing up new considerations.
First, she highlights a health hazard that gamma radiation can lead to, directly rebutting a claim made by the Proponent. Second, she highlights an alternative that would also provide the benefit of irradiation while avoiding the downside noted. Let's find an answer that reflects this method of rebuttal.
Answer Explanation:
The Opponent offers an alternative to irradiation—a chemical dip—that prevents Salmonella while avoiding the problem with botulism. This answer correctly describes the Opponent's response, so it's the correct answer.
Key Takeaway:
As we've seen time and again, alternatives on the LSAT—causes, explanations, solutions—play a central feature in the logic of arguments. Pay attention when one is provided!
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
-
Started by stanborodyansky
-
Please explain 3 replies
Started by Virginia_61092