Reading comp PrepTest 109 · Section 2 · Question 11

Passage

Questions 8-14  .        The autobiographical narrative Incidents in the Life  . of a Slave Girl, Written by Herself , Remaining source text redacted.
Passage walkthrough
Passage Summary

Topic: Humanities


Paragraph 1

  • Paragraph note
    • Author on Jacobs's autobiography (uses domestic novel conventions to create sympathy for enslaved people)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Author's view:
      • Harriet A. Jacobs's autobiographical narrative Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, Written by Herself used the conventions of the sentimental domestic novel to cause free women to sympathize with enslaved people (second through last sentences)
    • Comparison, according to the author:
      • Jacobs's autobiography uses the same conventions of the sentimental domestic novel (third sentence)
    • Examples of values embodied in the sentimental domestic novel and Jacobs's autobiography, according to the author:
      • The desirability of marriage and the sanctity of personal identity, home, and family (third sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "provides" (first sentence), "demonstrates to her readers" (last sentence)

Paragraph 2

  • Paragraph note
    • A criticism of Jacobs's autobiography (shortchanges her unique experience) and the author's rebuttal (can't easily apply genre's values to an enslaved person's narrative)
  • Views, minor Meta-Structures, and the author's attitude
    • Some critics' views:
      • Using the conventions of the domestic novel undermines Jacobs' story of enslavement (first sentence)
    • Example of criticism:
      • Domestic novel conventions overshadow the slave narrative (first sentence)
    • Author's view:
      • Jacobs uses this tension between the domestic novel and an enslaved person's narrative to show how the domestic novel's values are not achieved enslaved people (second sentence)
    • Comparisons, according to the author:
      • Unlike the typical domestic novel, Jacobs sends her lover away to protect him (third sentence)
      • Unlike the typical domestic novel, Jacobs must sacrifice a stable home and some family members to achieve her freedom (fourth sentence)
      • The "hierarchy or values" promoted by the domestic novel — where family and domesticity are prioritized — do not necessarily apply to enslaved people, who have to sacrifice those to attain their freedom (last sentence)
    • Author's attitude: "more complex" (second sentence), "creates a tension" (second sentence), "calling into question" (second sentence), "thus becomes an antidomestic novel" (last sentence), "demonstrates" (last sentence), "cannot be fully understood without shedding" (last sentence)

Main Point: Despite claims to the contrary, Jacobs's use of domestic novel conventions in her book is a valuable literary decision, as it forces her readers to examine the values of that literary genre from the perspective of an enslaved woman and become more sympathetic with her plight.

Meta-Structure?

Rebutting Critics: This passage utilizes a Rebutting Critics Meta-Structure.* In such a passage, the author presents one or more criticisms of the subject matter before mounting a defense against those critiques.

And that's what the author does here. After introducing Harriet A. Jacobs's autobiography, the author offers their argument about that narrative: it used the conventions of the domestic novel to force her readers to examine the values of that literary genre from the perspective of an enslaved woman and become more sympathetic to her plight as an enslaved woman. The author then gives voice to critics who argue that the book's use of these conventions undermines its effectiveness as a slave narrative. The author completely disagrees with these critics, saying that Jacobs' narrative is instead enriched and empowered by the tension between these two genres. The passage concludes by describing how the book uses the expectations and values of domestic novels to force its readers to reexamine the genre's values from a broader cultural perspective.

In a passage that uses a Rebutting Critics Meta-Structure, the main point is generally the author's central defense. The author summarizes this defense in the last sentence, so we could use that to anticipate the main point. We also formed our own summary: "Despite claims to the contrary, Jacobs's use of domestic novel conventions in her book is a valuable literary decision, as it forces her readers to examine the values of that literary genre from the perspective of an enslaved woman and become more sympathetic with her plight.

*As is often the case with a passage from the Critical Meta-Structure family, several Meta-Structures from that family could work for this passage. You could certainly call this a Correcting the Record passage or a Criticizing a Viewpoint passage and still come up with a workable understanding of the passage's structure and main point. You could even think of this as an Innovative [Subject] passage, as the author discusses Jacobs's innovations within a literary genre.

Comparison: The most prominent minor Meta-Structure is the comparison. The author compares and contrasts Jacobs's autobiography to a typical domestic novel throughout the passage. The two books espouse the same values. But given Jacobs's experiences as an enslaved woman, her narrative plays out in a very different way as the narratives in a typical domestic novel. Having these comparisons highlighted will make answering the inevitable questions on these similarities and differences much easier.

Last Thoughts?

The author doesn't make understanding their point very easy in this passage, which is typical English major stuff if you ask us. So, Jacobs's autobiography leads "her free readers to perceive [the domestic novel's] values within a broader social context" (P1, S5), forcing the readers to question "the applicability of the hierarchy of values espoused by the domestic novel to those who are in her situation" (P2, S2), and shows that such values "cannot be fully understood without shedding conventional perspectives (P2, S6). If you didn't quite follow that, use the author's premises and your common sense. Fortunately, the author makes the premises easy to follow. Unlike the typical domestic novel, where the protagonist finds love and family, Jacobs must sacrifice those to attain her freedom (P2, S3-S5). Her narrative suggests these values — love and family — are important to Jacobs, but her experience as an enslaved woman forces her to sacrifice those. What point is the author trying to make about that? How might Jacobs's narrative force readers to examine these values in a "broader social context" or question "the hierarchy of these values"? Why might that help free readers sympathize more with an enslaved woman? On a real test, when you don't have an explanation to rely on, you need to ask yourself these questions to figure out passages with difficult language!

Question prompt

Which one of the Remaining source text redacted.
Why the credited answer is right

Credited answer: A

The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.

Question Type

Humanities

Strategy Overview

Review the position of the critics, determine weaknesses in their claim to anticipate how to improve it, and select the answer choice that makes the claim more convincing

Answer Anticipation

We'll approach Strengthen questions in Reading Comprehension in a very similar manner as we would in Logical Reasoning. We can review the claim from the passage, just like we'd carefully read an argument in LR. We'll then interrogate the claim for any weaknesses since the correct answer on both RC and LR will probably strengthen the claim by fixing a problem. Additionally, causation flaws are commonplace on Strengthen questions in both RC and LR, so we'll be especially mindful of those.So, let's start by identifying the critics' claim. We can use our notes or our memory from the previous question to recall that they think that Jacobs undermines her story as an enslaved woman by using the conventions of the sentimental domestic novel.So, what's wrong with that claim? Well, what evidence do these critics use to back up this claim? There's not much. In fact, we don't get their reasoning — no explanation of how or why this is the case. So, to anticipate an answer choice that would strengthen this claim, we can keep our eyes peeled for one that would answer these questions: why or how does blending genres compromise Jacobs's narrative as an enslaved woman?

Answer choices

  1. A
    Most readers of Jacobs's Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice A matches the stem

    (A) Does this show why or how blending genres compromises Jacobs's narrative as an enslaved woman?

    Yes! This strengthens the claim by explaining how the blend of genres weakens the purpose of Jacobs's narrative as an enslaved woman. If readers only saw the book as a domestic novel, they clearly didn't view the book as an attempt to recount an autobiographical narrative of an enslaved woman's life.

    And recall the passage's main point: Jacobs's autobiography forced her readers to examine the values of the domestic literary genre from the perspective of an enslaved woman and become more sympathetic to her plight. If Jacobs's audience saw the book as a typical domestic novel, then Jacobs's autobiography didn't achieve this purpose. That would strengthen the critics' claims that the domestic novel conventions in Jacobs's autobiography overshaded the purpose of her narrative as an enslaved person. Therefore, (A) is our answer!

    While most test-takers prefer to view all the answer choices on a Strengthen question before selecting one, we would be entirely justified in selecting (A) and moving on to the next question without reading (B) through (E).

  2. B
    Many reviewers of Jacobs's Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice B is not credited

    (B) Does this show why or how blending genres compromises Jacobs's narrative as an enslaved woman?

    Nope. If reviewers called for the abolition of slavery after reading Jacobs's book, then they probably sympathized with her plight as an enslaved woman. In that case, these reviewers either only saw Jacobs's book as an autobiographical narrative about an enslaved woman or they saw how that genre and the conventions of the domestic novel produced a tension that forced readers to examine the values of the domestic literary genre from the perspective of an enslaved woman and become more sympathetic to her plight. Either way, this weakens the critics' claim that the conventions of the domestic novel overwhelmed the impact of her narrative as an enslaved woman.

  3. C
    Most scholars believe that Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice C is not credited

    (C) Does this show why or how blending genres compromises Jacobs's narrative as an enslaved woman?

    Nope. This indicates that most scholars believe the opposite of what the critics argue. If most scholars believe this, then the critics' view would look unorthodox — perhaps even unreliable. All these scholars may be wrong, but their consensus definitely doesn't make the critics' position more convincing. (C) is out.

  4. D
    Jacobs's narrative was modeled Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice D is not credited

    (D) Does this show why or how blending genres compromises Jacobs's narrative as an enslaved woman?

    No. This doesn't affect the critics' claim at all. They say that the conventions of the domestic novel overshadowed Jacobs's narrative as an enslaved woman. Whether Jacobs also pulled from realistic novels doesn't affect Jacobs's use of domestic novel conventions and her narrative as an enslaved woman.

  5. E
    Jacobs's goal in crafting Remaining source text redacted.
    Why choice E is not credited

    (E) Does this show why or how blending genres compromises Jacobs's narrative as an enslaved woman?

    No. Like (D), this introduces more information that doesn't affect the critics' claim. Perhaps the book would have been more effective at revealing these injustices if it hadn't been bogged down by the conventions of the domestic novel! Or, perhaps Jacobs's use of domestic novel conventions helped make these injustices more vivid! (E) doesn't say or imply which outcome is more probable, so we can't say that (E) strengthens the critics' argument.

What this tests

Question analytics

Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.

Answer choice distribution

  1. A Credited 87%
  2. B 1%
  3. C 7%
  4. D 2%
  5. E 2%

Deeper help

Ask follow-ups on any step

Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.

Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.

Discussion

No threads yet—be the first to ask a question or share an approach.