Logical reasoning PrepTest 107 · Section 1 · Question 22
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: D
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Argument or Facts
Valid or Flawed
Question Type
Stimulus Summary
Answer Anticipation
Answer choices
-
AIf the government claims Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A is not credited
The government here claimed that something is safe, so this answer doesn’t apply. -
BFear that a certain Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
Those who have control over whether a plant melts down are those running the plant, not the government. And even with the liability shield, the plant isn’t going to make money if it explodes - the shield will just prevent them from going bankrupt. This answer is incorrect, but it’s tempting because it so directly addresses the judgment in the conclusion! It just fails to connect it to the premises. -
CIf a potentially dangerous Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
The conclusion is about the public’s fear, not about what’s in the best interests of the public. The public could fear something that is in their best interest, and they could welcome something that’s actually quite dangerous! -
DThe government sometimes makes Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D matches the stem
This answer is a bit convoluted with how it works with the stimulus! However, let’s unpack it. First, the opening line is pivoted away from, so let’s skip that (it lines up with the government’s claim that the plants are safe). From there, it says that it doesn’t act to prevent situations unless there’s a chance they happen. What situation is the government acting to prevent? Nuclear bankruptcy due to financial liability for accidents. So, then, there must be a risk of such financial liability coming about. And the conditional premises establish that such liability exists only if there are injuries from a nuclear accident. So this answer guarantees that there’s a risk of liability, and the conditional premises guarantee that, therefore, there’s a risk of nuclear accident. If there’s a risk of nuclear accident, then the public’s fear of an accident is well-founded, justifying the conclusion. -
EIf a real financial Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
This answer justifies the government’s action, not the Editorial’s conclusion.
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
-
Correct answer 2 replies
Started by devon
-
Why D 1 reply
Started by irinajugovic1
-
Why D and not C ? 2 replies
Started by Maxx