Logical reasoning PrepTest 106 · Section 1 · Question 20
Question prompt
Why the credited answer is right
Credited answer: A
The notes below walk through why it fits the stem and how to eliminate the rest.
Argument or Facts
Valid or Flawed
Question Type
Stimulus Summary
Answer Anticipation
Answer choices
-
AEither the economy is Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice A matches the stem
Either/or statements can be read as at least one on the LSAT, so this answer says that at least one of these is true: Economy weak OR Investment decreasing. This would be false, therefore, if neither of these is true. The last line tells us that investment isn’t decreasing, and that allows us to conclude that the economy isn’t weak, based on the two conditionals (as we walked through in our anticipation). Since neither of these things is true, it must be false that at least one of them is, making this our answer. -
BIf unemployment rises, the Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice B is not credited
The stimulus doesn’t connect unemployment rising and prices remaining constant in a conditional - they’re both included in the same condition in the first conditional. Since there’s no direct relationship between these two, this answer could be true, so we can eliminate it. -
CThe economy is weak Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice C is not credited
This answer combines the two conditionals. Remember, we can split up AND necessary conditions since both are individually true. The first conditional, then, tells us that Economy weak → Unemployment rises, and the second chains with that, guaranteeing that investment decreases. As such, the chain says Economy weak → Investment decreases, matching this answer. Since it must be true, we can eliminate it. -
DEither the economy is Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice D is not credited
We talked about Either/Or statements in answer choice (A), so we’re going to take a different tack here to give you more tools to work with! An either/or statement talking about A and B can be diagrammed as ~A → B (this comes up a lot in the LG section). So let’s treat this answer as ~Economy weak → Prices constant. The relationship between these two in the stimulus is Economy weak → Prices constant. These two statements don’t contradict each other, so this answer doesn’t have to be false. (To contradict a conditional with another conditional, you keep the sufficient condition the same but negate the necessary condition; this does the opposite.) -
EEither unemployment is rising Remaining source text redacted.
Why choice E is not credited
Let’s use the same method here as in (D), and view this answer as: ~Unemployment rising → ~Economy weak. We actually know that this is true based on the contrapositive of the first conditional, so we can eliminate this answer.
What this tests
Question analytics
Based on historical answer selection rates for this question.
Answer choice distribution
Accounts
Save your place across PrepTests
Bookmark questions, build weak-spot lists, and pick up exactly where you left off—built for serious repeat practice.
No payment yet. We will only email when accounts open.
Already have an account? Log in
Deeper help
Ask follow-ups on any step
Optional AI tutor mode will let you interrogate assumptions, compare answers, and drill weak patterns without leaving the page.
Human-written explanations stay primary; AI is an add-on when you want it.
Discussion
-
Typo 1 reply
Started by Lex